Section VI.1

The Adjoint of a Linear Operator

[12/0%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem VI.1.1

Prove Proposition 1.3: if X\mathscr {X} and Y\mathscr {Y} are Banach spaces, A,B∈B(X,Y)A, B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathscr {X}, \mathscr {Y}), and α,β∈F\alpha , \beta \in \mathbb {F}, then (αA+βB)∗=αA∗+βB∗(\alpha A + \beta B)^* = \alpha A^* + \beta B^*. Moreover, A∗:(Y∗,wk∗)→(X∗,wk∗)A^*: (\mathscr {Y}^*, \mathrm{wk}^*) \to (\mathscr {X}^*, \mathrm{wk}^*) is continuous.

?
Problem VI.1.2

Complete the proof of Proposition 1.4: if X\mathscr {X} and Y\mathscr {Y} are Banach spaces and A∈B(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{B}(\mathscr {X}, \mathscr {Y}), then:

?
(a)

A∗∗∣X=AA^{**}|\mathscr {X} = A;

(b)

∥A∗∥=∥A∥\left\| A^*\right\| = \left\| A\right\|;

(c)

if AA is invertible, then A∗A^* is invertible and (A∗)−1=(A−1)∗(A^*)^{-1} = (A^{-1})^*;

(d)

if Z\mathscr {Z} is a Banach space and B∈B(Y,Z)B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathscr {Y}, \mathscr {Z}), then (BA)∗=A∗B∗(BA)^* = A^*B^*.

Problem VI.1.3

Verify the statement made in (1.5): let (X,Ω,μ)(X, \Omega , \mu ) and Mϕ:Lp(μ)→Lp(μ)M_\phi : L^p(\mu ) \to L^p(\mu ) be as in Example III.2.2. If 1≤p<∞1 \le p < \infty and 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1, then Mϕ∗:Lq(μ)→Lq(μ)M_\phi^*: L^q(\mu ) \to L^q(\mu ) is given by Mϕ∗f=ϕfM_\phi^* f = \phi f. That is, Mϕ∗=MϕM_\phi^* = M_\phi.

?
Problem VI.1.4

Verify the statement made in (1.6): let KK and kk be as in Example III.2.3. If 1≤p<∞1 \le p < \infty and 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1, then K∗:Lq(μ)→Lq(μ)K^*: L^q(\mu ) \to L^q(\mu ) is the integral operator with kernel k∗(x,y)≡k(y,x)k^*(x, y) \equiv k(y, x).

?
Problem VI.1.5

Verify the statement made in (1.7): let XX, YY, τ\tau, and AA be as in Example III.2.4. Then A∗:M(Y)→M(X)A^*: M(Y) \to M(X) is given by

(A∗μ)(Δ)=μ(τ−1(Δ)) (A^*\mu )(\Delta ) = \mu (\tau ^{-1}(\Delta ))

for every Borel subset Δ\Delta of XX and every μ\mu in M(Y)M(Y).

?
Problem VI.1.6

Let 1≤p<∞1 \le p < \infty and define S:lp→lpS: l^p \to l^p by S(α1,α2,…)=(0,α1,α2,…)S(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots ) = (0, \alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots ). Compute S∗S^*.

?
Problem VI.1.7

Let A∈B(c0)A \in \mathcal{B}(c_0) and for n≥1n \ge 1, define ene_n in c0c_0 by en(n)=1e_n(n) = 1 and en(m)=0e_n(m) = 0 for m≠nm \ne n. Put αmn=(Aen)(m)\alpha_{mn} = (Ae_n)(m) for m,n≥1m, n \ge 1.

?
(a)

Prove that M≡sup⁡m∑n=1∞∣αmn∣<∞M \equiv \sup_m \sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \left|\alpha_{mn}\right| < \infty;

(b)

Prove that for every nn, αmn→0\alpha_{mn} \to 0 as m→∞m \to \infty.

Conversely, if {αmn:m,n≥1}\{ \alpha_{mn}: m, n \ge 1\} are scalars satisfying (a) and (b), then

(Ax)(m)=∑n=1∞αmnx(n) (Ax)(m) = \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \alpha _{mn} x(n)

defines a bounded operator AA on c0c_0 and ∥A∥=M\left\| A\right\| = M. Find A∗A^*.

Problem VI.1.8

Let A∈B(l1)A \in \mathcal{B}(l^1) and for n≥1n \ge 1 define ene_n in l1l^1 by en(n)=1e_n(n) = 1, en(m)=0e_n(m) = 0 for m≠nm \ne n. Put αmn=(Aen)(m)\alpha_{mn} = (Ae_n)(m) for m,n≥1m, n \ge 1.

?
(a)

Prove that M≡sup⁡n∑m=1∞∣αmn∣<∞M \equiv \sup_n \sum_{m=1}^{\infty } \left|\alpha_{mn}\right| < \infty;

(b)

Prove that for every mm, sup⁡n∣αmn∣<∞\sup_n \left|\alpha_{mn}\right| < \infty.

Conversely, if {αmn:m,n≥1}\{ \alpha_{mn}: m, n \ge 1\} are scalars satisfying (a) and (b), then

(Af)(m)=∑n=1∞αmnf(n) (Af)(m) = \sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \alpha _{mn} f(n)

defines a bounded operator AA on l1l^1 and ∥A∥=M\left\| A\right\| = M. Find A∗A^*.

Problem VI.1.9

(Bonsall [1986]) Let X\mathscr {X} be a Banach space, ZZ a nonempty set, and u:Z→Xu: Z \to \mathscr {X}. If there are positive constants M1M_1 and M2M_2 such that (i) ∥u(z)∥≤M1\left\| u(z)\right\| \le M_1 for all zz in ZZ and (ii) for every x∗x^* in X\mathscr {X}, sup⁡{∣⟨u(z),x∗⟩∣:z∈Z}≥M2∥x∗∥\sup \left\{ \left|\langle u(z), x^* \rangle \right|: z \in Z\right\} \ge M_2 \left\| x^*\right\|; then for every xx in X\mathscr {X} there is an ff in l1(Z)l^1(Z) such that (∗) x=∑{f(z)u(z):z∈Z}(*)\ x = \sum \left\{ f(z)u(z): z \in Z\right\} and M2inf⁡∥f∥1≤∥x∥≤M1inf⁡∥f∥1M_2 \inf \left\| f\right\|_1 \le \left\| x\right\| \le M_1 \inf \left\| f\right\|_1, where the infimum is taken over all ff in l1(Z)l^1(Z) such that (∗)(*) holds.

?
Problem VI.1.10

(Bonsall [1986]) Let mm be normalized Lebesgue measure on ∂D\partial \mathbb {D} and for ∣z∣<1\left|z\right| < 1 and ∣w∣=1\left|w\right| = 1 let pz(w)=(1−∣z∣2)/∣1−zˉw∣2p_z(w) = (1 - \left|z\right|^2)/\left|1 - \bar{z}w\right|^2. So pzp_z is the Poisson kernel. Show that if f∈L1(m)f \in L^1(m), then there is a sequence {zn}⊆D\left\{ z_n\right\} \subseteq \mathbb {D} and a sequence {λn}\left\{ \lambda_n\right\} in l1l^1 such that (∗) f=∑n=1∞λnpzn(*)\ f = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \lambda_n p_{z_n}. Moreover, ∥f∥1=inf⁡∑n=1∞∣λn∣\left\| f\right\|_1 = \inf \sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \left|\lambda_n\right|, where the infimum is taken over all {λn}\left\{ \lambda_n\right\} in l1l^1 such that (∗)(*) holds.

?
Problem VI.1.11

If X\mathscr {X} and Y\mathscr {Y} are Banach spaces and B∈B(Y∗,X∗)B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathscr {Y}^*, \mathscr {X}^*), then there is an operator AA in B(X,Y)\mathcal{B}(\mathscr {X}, \mathscr {Y}) such that B=A∗B = A^* if and only if BB is wk∗\mathrm{wk}^*-continuous.

?
Problem VI.1.12

If X\mathscr {X} is a Banach space and M\mathscr {M} and N\mathscr {N} are closed subspaces, show that the following statements are equivalent.

?
(a)

M+N\mathscr {M} + \mathscr {N} is closed.

(b)

The range of the linear transformation x→(x+M)⊕(x+N)x \to (x + \mathscr {M}) \oplus (x + \mathscr {N}) from X\mathscr {X} into X/M⊕X/N\mathscr {X}/\mathscr {M} \oplus \mathscr {X}/\mathscr {N} is closed.

(c)

M⊥+N⊥\mathscr {M}^\perp + \mathscr {N}^\perp is norm closed in X∗\mathscr {X}^*.

(d)

M⊥+N⊥\mathscr {M}^\perp + \mathscr {N}^\perp is weak* closed in X∗\mathscr {X}^*.