Section IX.10

Multiplicity Theory for Normal Operators: A Complete Set of Unitary Invariants

[14/0%]
LaTeX
Problem IX.10.1

Let AA and BB be operators on H\mathcal{H} and K\mathcal{K}, respectively. Let H0\mathcal{H}_0 and K0\mathcal{K}_0 be reducing subspaces for AA and BB and suppose that A≅B∣K0A \cong B | \mathcal{K}_0 and B≅A∣H0B \cong A | \mathcal{H}_0. Show that A≅BA \cong B.

?
Problem IX.10.2

Let μ1,μ2,…\mu_1, \mu_2, \dots be compactly supported measures on C\mathbb {C} such that μn+1≪μn\mu_{n+1} \ll \mu_n for all nn. Show that if MM is any normal operator whose spectral measure is absolutely continuous with respect to each μn\mu_n, then

Nμ1⊕Nμ2⊕⋯≅(Nμ1⊕Nμ2⊕⋯ )⊕M. N_{\mu _1} \oplus N_{\mu _2} \oplus \cdots \cong (N_{\mu _1} \oplus N_{\mu _2} \oplus \cdots ) \oplus M.
?
Problem IX.10.3

If μ\mu is Lebesgue measure on [0,1][0, 1], show that Nμ≅NμpN_\mu \cong N_\mu^p for 0<p<∞0 < p < \infty.

?
Problem IX.10.4

Let μ\mu be Lebesgue measure on [0,1][0, 1] and characterize the functions ϕ\phi in L∞(μ)L^\infty (\mu ) such that Nμ≅ϕ(Nμ)N_\mu \cong \phi (N_\mu ).

?
Problem IX.10.5

Let μ\mu be area measure on D\mathbb {D} and show that NμN_\mu and Nμ2N_\mu^2 are not unitarily equivalent.

?
Problem IX.10.6

Let μ\mu be Lebesgue measure on [0,1][0, 1] and let ν\nu be Lebesgue measure on [−1,1][-1, 1]. Show that Nν2≅Nμ⊕NμN_\nu^2 \cong N_\mu \oplus N_\mu. How about Nν3N_\nu^3?

?
Problem IX.10.7

Let μ\mu be Lebesgue measure on R\mathbb {R} and N=N = multiplication by sin⁡x\sin x on L2(μ)L^2(\mu ). Find the decompositions of NN obtained in Theorem 10.1 and Theorem 10.16, stated below.

Theorem 10.1: (a) If NN is a normal operator, then there is a sequence (possibly finite) of measures {μn}\{ \mu_n\} on C\mathbb {C} such that μn+1≪μn\mu_{n+1} \ll \mu_n for all nn and N≅Nμ1⊕Nμ2⊕⋯N \cong N_{\mu_1} \oplus N_{\mu_2} \oplus \cdots. (b) If NN and {μn}\{ \mu_n\} are as in (a) and M≅Nν1⊕Nν2⊕⋯M \cong N_{\nu_1} \oplus N_{\nu_2} \oplus \cdots, where νn+1≪νn\nu_{n+1} \ll \nu_n for all nn, then N≅MN \cong M if and only if [μn]=[νn][\mu_n] = [\nu_n] for all nn.

Theorem 10.16: If NN is a normal operator, then there are mutually singular measures μ∞,μ1,μ2,…\mu_\infty , \mu_1, \mu_2, \dots (some of which may be zero) such that

N≅Nμ∞(∞)⊕Nμ1⊕Nμ2(2)⊕⋯ . N \cong N_{\mu _\infty }^{(\infty )} \oplus N_{\mu _1} \oplus N_{\mu _2}^{(2)} \oplus \cdots .

If MM is another normal operator with corresponding measures ν∞,ν1,ν2,…\nu_\infty , \nu_1, \nu_2, \dots, then N≅MN \cong M if and only if [μn]=[νn][\mu_n] = [\nu_n] for 1≤n≤∞1 \leq n \leq \infty.

?
Problem IX.10.8

If μ\mu is Lebesgue measure on R\mathbb {R} and N=N = multiplication by eixe^{ix} on L2(μ)L^2(\mu ), show that N≅Nm(∞)N \cong N_m^{(\infty )}, where m=m = arc length measure on ∂D\partial \mathbb {D}.

?
Problem IX.10.9

Define U:L2(R)→L2(R)U: L^2(\mathbb {R}) \to L^2(\mathbb {R}) by (Uf)(t)=f(t−1)(Uf)(t) = f(t - 1). Show that UU is unitary and find its scalar-valued spectral measure and multiplicity function.

?
Problem IX.10.10

Represent NN as in the following theorem (Theorem 10.1(a): if NN is a normal operator, then there is a sequence (possibly finite) of measures {μn}\{ \mu_n\} on C\mathbb {C} such that μn+1≪μn\mu_{n+1} \ll \mu_n for all nn and N≅Nμ1⊕Nμ2⊕⋯N \cong N_{\mu_1} \oplus N_{\mu_2} \oplus \cdots) and find the corresponding representation for N⊕N=N(2)N \oplus N = N^{(2)}; for N(3)N^{(3)}; for N(∞)N^{(\infty )}. (Are you surprised by the result for N(∞)N^{(\infty )}?)

?
Problem IX.10.11

Prove the results and solve the exercises from II.8.

?
Problem IX.10.12

Let NN be a normal operator and show that N≅N(2)N \cong N^{(2)} if and only if there is a ∗*-cyclic normal operator MM such that N≅M(∞)N \cong M^{(\infty )}. What does this say about the multiplicity function for NN?

?
Problem IX.10.13

Let (X,Ω,μ)(X, \Omega , \mu ) be a measure space such that L2(μ)L^2(\mu ) is separable, let ϕ∈L∞(μ)\phi \in L^\infty (\mu ), and let N=MϕN = M_\phi on L2(μ)L^2(\mu ). Find the decompositions of NN obtained in Theorem 10.1 and Theorem 10.16, stated below.

Theorem 10.1: (a) If NN is a normal operator, then there is a sequence (possibly finite) of measures {μn}\{ \mu_n\} on C\mathbb {C} such that μn+1≪μn\mu_{n+1} \ll \mu_n for all nn and N≅Nμ1⊕Nμ2⊕⋯N \cong N_{\mu_1} \oplus N_{\mu_2} \oplus \cdots. (b) If NN and {μn}\{ \mu_n\} are as in (a) and M≅Nν1⊕Nν2⊕⋯M \cong N_{\nu_1} \oplus N_{\nu_2} \oplus \cdots, where νn+1≪νn\nu_{n+1} \ll \nu_n for all nn, then N≅MN \cong M if and only if [μn]=[νn][\mu_n] = [\nu_n] for all nn.

Theorem 10.16: If NN is a normal operator, then there are mutually singular measures μ∞,μ1,μ2,…\mu_\infty , \mu_1, \mu_2, \dots (some of which may be zero) such that

N≅Nμ∞(∞)⊕Nμ1⊕Nμ2(2)⊕⋯ . N \cong N_{\mu _\infty }^{(\infty )} \oplus N_{\mu _1} \oplus N_{\mu _2}^{(2)} \oplus \cdots .

If MM is another normal operator with corresponding measures ν∞,ν1,ν2,…\nu_\infty , \nu_1, \nu_2, \dots, then N≅MN \cong M if and only if [μn]=[νn][\mu_n] = [\nu_n] for 1≤n≤∞1 \leq n \leq \infty.

?
Problem IX.10.14

Let μ\mu be a compactly supported measure on C\mathbb {C}, ϕ\phi a bounded Borel function on C\mathbb {C}, and suppose {Δn}\{ \Delta_n\} are pairwise disjoint Borel sets such that ϕ\phi is one-to-one on each Δn\Delta_n and μ(C∖⋃n=1∞Δn)=0\mu (\mathbb {C} \setminus \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty \Delta_n) = 0. Let ϕn=ϕχΔn\phi_n = \phi \chi_{\Delta_n} and μn=μ∘ϕn−1\mu_n = \mu \circ \phi_n^{-1} for n≥1n \geq 1. Prove that MϕM_\phi on L2(μ)L^2(\mu ) is unitarily equivalent to ⨁n=1∞Nμn\bigoplus_{n=1}^\infty N_{\mu_n}.

?