Section II.1

Elementary Properties and Examples

[13/0%]
LaTeX
Problem II.1.1

Prove Proposition 1.1: Let H\mathcal{H} and K\mathcal{K} be Hilbert spaces and A:H→KA: \mathcal{H} \rightarrow \mathcal{K} a linear transformation. The following statements are equivalent.

  1. AA is continuous.

  2. AA is continuous at 00.

  3. AA is continuous at some point.

  4. There is a constant c>0c > 0 such that ∥Ah∥≤c∥h∥\left\| Ah\right\| \leq c \left\| h\right\| for all hh in H\mathcal{H}.

?
Problem II.1.2

Prove Proposition 1.2: (a) If AA and B∈B(H,K)B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{K}), then A+B∈B(H,K)A+B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{K}), and ∥A+B∥≤∥A∥+∥B∥\left\| A+B\right\| \leq \left\| A\right\| +\left\| B\right\|.

(b) If α∈F\alpha \in \mathbb {F} and A∈B(H,K)A \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{K}), then αA∈B(H,K)\alpha A \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{K}) and ∥αA∥=∣α∣∥A∥\left\| \alpha A\right\| = \left|\alpha \right| \left\| A\right\|.

(c) If A∈B(H,K)A \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{K}) and B∈B(K,L)B \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{K}, \mathcal{L}), then BA∈B(H,L)BA \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{L}) and ∥BA∥≤∥B∥∥A∥\left\| BA\right\| \leq \left\| B\right\| \left\| A\right\|.

?
Problem II.1.3

Suppose {e1,e2,…}\left\{ e_{1}, e_{2}, \ldots \right\} is an orthonormal basis for H\mathcal{H} and for each nn there is a vector AenAe_{n} in H\mathcal{H} such that ∑∥Aen∥<∞\sum \left\| Ae_{n}\right\| < \infty. Show that AA has a unique extension to a bounded operator on H\mathcal{H}.

?
Problem II.1.4

Proposition 1.2 says that d(A,B)=∥A−B∥d(A,B) = \left\| A-B\right\| is a metric on B(H,K)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{K}). Show that B(H,K)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}, \mathcal{K}) is complete relative to this metric.

?
Problem II.1.5

Show that a multiplication operator MϕM_{\phi } satisfies Mϕ2=MϕM_{\phi }^{2} = M_{\phi } if and only if ϕ\phi is a characteristic function.

Theorem 1.5 (context for MϕM_\phi): Let (X,Ω,μ)(X, \Omega , \mu ) be a σ\sigma-finite measure space and put H=L2(X,Ω,μ)≡L2(μ)\mathcal{H} = L^{2}(X, \Omega , \mu ) \equiv L^{2}(\mu ). If ϕ∈L∞(μ)\phi \in L^{\infty }(\mu ), define Mϕ:L2(μ)→L2(μ)M_{\phi }: L^{2}(\mu ) \rightarrow L^{2}(\mu ) by Mϕf=ϕfM_{\phi } f = \phi f. Then Mϕ∈B(L2(μ))M_{\phi } \in \mathcal{B}(L^{2}(\mu )) and ∥Mϕ∥=∥ϕ∥∞\left\| M_{\phi }\right\| = \left\| \phi \right\|_{\infty }.

?
Problem II.1.6

Let (X,Ω,μ)(X, \Omega , \mu ) be a σ\sigma-finite measure space and let k1,k2k_{1}, k_{2} be two kernels satisfying the hypothesis of (1.6):

Theorem 1.6 (context): Let (X,Ω,μ)(X, \Omega , \mu ) be a measure space and suppose k:X×X→Fk: X \times X \rightarrow \mathbb {F} is an Ω×Ω\Omega \times \Omega-measurable function for which there are constants c1c_{1} and c2c_{2} such that

∫X∣k(x,y)∣ dμ(y)≤c1a.e. [μ], \int _{X} \left|k(x,y)\right| \, d\mu (y) \leq c_{1} \quad \text{a.e. } [\mu ], ∫X∣k(x,y)∣ dμ(x)≤c2a.e. [μ]. \int _{X} \left|k(x,y)\right| \, d\mu (x) \leq c_{2} \quad \text{a.e. } [\mu ].

If K:L2(μ)→L2(μ)K: L^{2}(\mu ) \rightarrow L^{2}(\mu ) is defined by

(Kf)(x)=∫k(x,y)f(y) dμ(y), (Kf)(x) = \int k(x,y) f(y) \, d\mu (y),

then KK is a bounded linear operator and ∥K∥≤(c1c2)1/2\left\| K\right\| \leq (c_{1} c_{2})^{1/2}.

Define

k:X×X→Fbyk(x,y)=∫k1(x,z)k2(z,y) dμ(z). k: X \times X \rightarrow \mathbb {F} \quad \text{by} \quad k(x,y) = \int k_{1}(x,z) k_{2}(z,y) \, d\mu (z).
?
(a)

Show that kk also satisfies the hypothesis of (1.6).

(b)

If K,K1,K2K, K_{1}, K_{2} are the integral operators with kernels k,k1,k2k, k_{1}, k_{2}, show that K=K1K2K = K_{1} K_{2}. What does this remind you of? Is more going on than an analogy?

Problem II.1.7

If (X,Ω,μ)(X, \Omega , \mu ) is a measure space and k∈L2(μ×μ)k \in L^{2}(\mu \times \mu ), show that kk defines a bounded integral operator.

?
Problem II.1.8

Let {en}\left\{ e_{n}\right\} be the usual basis for l2l^{2} and let {αn}\left\{ \alpha_{n}\right\} be a sequence of scalars. Show that there is a bounded operator AA on l2l^{2} such that Aen=αnenAe_{n} = \alpha_{n} e_{n} for all nn if and only if {αn}\left\{ \alpha_{n}\right\} is uniformly bounded, in which case ∥A∥=sup⁡{∣αn∣:n≥1}\left\| A\right\| = \sup \left\{ \left|\alpha_{n}\right|: n \geq 1\right\}. This type of operator is called a diagonal operator or is said to be diagonalizable.

?
Problem II.1.9

Let {αij}i,j=1∞\left\{ \alpha_{ij}\right\}_{i,j=1}^{\infty } be an infinite matrix such that αij≥0\alpha_{ij} \geq 0 for all i,ji,j and such that there are scalars pi>0p_{i} > 0 and β,γ>0\beta , \gamma > 0 with

∑i=1∞αijpi≤βpj, \sum _{i=1}^{\infty } \alpha _{ij} p_{i} \leq \beta p_{j}, ∑j=1∞αijpj≤γpi \sum _{j=1}^{\infty } \alpha _{ij} p_{j} \leq \gamma p_{i}

for all i,j≥1i, j \geq 1. Show that there is an operator AA on l2(N)l^{2}(\mathbb {N}) with ⟨Aej,ei⟩=αij\left\langle Ae_{j}, e_{i} \right\rangle = \alpha_{ij} and ∥A∥2≤βγ\left\| A\right\|^{2} \leq \beta \gamma.

?
Problem II.1.10

Show that ⟨Aej,ei⟩=(i+j+1)−1\left\langle Ae_{j}, e_{i} \right\rangle = (i+j+1)^{-1} for 0≤i,j<∞0 \leq i,j < \infty defines a bounded operator on l2(N∪{0})l^{2}(\mathbb {N} \cup \left\{ 0\right\} ) with ∥A∥≤π\left\| A\right\| \leq \pi. (See also Choi [1983] and Redheffer and Volkmann [1983].)

?
Problem II.1.11

If A=[abcd]A = \left[\begin{smallmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{smallmatrix}\right], put α=[∣a∣2+∣b∣2+∣c∣2+∣d∣2]1/2\alpha = [\left|a\right|^{2}+\left|b\right|^{2}+\left|c\right|^{2}+\left|d\right|^{2}]^{1/2} and show that ∥A∥=12(α2+α4−4δ2)\left\| A\right\| = \frac{1}{2}(\alpha^{2}+\sqrt{\alpha^{4}-4\delta^{2}}), where δ2=det⁡(A∗A)\delta^{2} = \operatorname {det}\left(A^{*}A\right).

?
Problem II.1.12

Let {Hi}\left\{ \mathcal{H}_{i}\right\} be a collection of Hilbert spaces and let H=⊕iHi\mathcal{H} = \oplus_{i} \mathcal{H}_{i}. Suppose Ai∈B(Hi)A_{i} \in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H}_{i}) for all ii. Show that there is a bounded operator AA on H\mathcal{H} such that A∣Hi=AiA|\mathcal{H}_{i} = A_{i} for all ii if and only if sup⁡i∥Ai∥<∞\sup_{i} \left\| A_{i}\right\| < \infty. In this case, ∥A∥=sup⁡i∥Ai∥\left\| A\right\| = \sup_{i} \left\| A_{i}\right\|. The operator AA is called the direct sum of the operators {Ai}\left\{ A_{i}\right\} and is denoted by A=⊕iAiA = \oplus_{i} A_{i}.

?
Problem II.1.13

Call a sequence of vectors {fn}\left\{ f_{n}\right\} in a Hilbert space H\mathcal{H} a Bessel sequence if ∑∣⟨f,fn⟩∣2<∞\sum \left| \left\langle f, f_{n} \right\rangle \right|^{2} < \infty for every ff in H\mathcal{H}. Show that a sequence {fn}\left\{ f_{n}\right\} of vectors in H\mathcal{H} is a Bessel sequence if and only if the infinite matrix (⟨fm,fn⟩)( \left\langle f_{m}, f_{n} \right\rangle ) defines a bounded operator on l2l^{2}. (Also see Shapiro and Shields [1961], p.524.)

?