The Integral
[7/29%]Suppose that is measurable and nonnegative. Show that if : or if for all
There are many functions familiar from calculus that ought to be integrable but are of the types in the preceding problem and hence have infinite upper integral. Examples are and . Therefore, (15.10) is inappropriate as a definition of for nonnegative . The only problem with (15.10), however, is that it treats infinity the wrong way. To see this, and to focus on essentials, assume that and that is bounded, although not necessarily nonnegative or measurable .
Show that
if refines . Prove a dual relation for the sums in (15.10) and conclude that
Now assume that is measurable and let be a bound for . Consider the partition , where ranges from to and is large enough that . Show that
Conclude that
To define the integral as the common value in (15.12) is the Darboux-Young approach. The advantage of (15.3) as a definition is that (in the nonnegative case) it applies at once to unbounded and infinite
3.2 15.2 ↑ For , define and by (3.9) and (3.10) with in place of . Show that and for every . Therefore, (15.12) can fail if is not measurable . (Where was measurability used in the proof of (15.12)?)
The definitions (15.3) and (15.6) always make formal sense (for finite and supif D, but they are reasonable-accord with intuition-only if (15.12) holds. Under what conditions does it hold?
Suppose of that there exist an F-set and a function , measurable , such that and . This is the same thing as assuming that , or assuming that is measurable with respect to completed with respect to . Show that (15.12) holds.
Show that if (15.12) holds, then so does the italicized condition in part (a).
Rather than assume that is measurable , one can assume that it satisfies the italicized condition in Problem 15.4(a)-which in case is complete is the same thing anyway. For the next three problems, assume that and that is measurable and bounded.
↑ Show that for positive there exists a finite partition such that, if is any finer partition and , then
↑ Show that
The limit on the right here is Lebesgue's definition of the integral.
↑ Suppose that the integral is defined for simple nonnegative functions by . Suppose that and are simple and nondecreasing and have a common limit: and . Adapt the arguments used to prove Theorem 15.1(iii) and show that . Thus, in the nonnegative case, can (Theorem 13.5) consistently be defined as for simple functions for which .