Section 15

The Integral

[7/29%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 15.1

Suppose that ff is measurable and nonnegative. Show that ∫∗fdμ=∞\int^{*} f d \mu =\infty if μ[ω\mu [\omega : f(ω)>0]=∞f(\omega )>0]=\infty or if μ[ω:f(ω)>a]>0\mu [\omega : f(\omega )>a]>0 for all aa

There are many functions familiar from calculus that ought to be integrable but are of the types in the preceding problem and hence have infinite upper integral. Examples are x−2I(1,∞)(x)x^{-2} I_{(1, \infty )}(x) and x−1/2I(0,1)(x)x^{-1 / 2} I_{(0,1)}(x). Therefore, (15.10) is inappropriate as a definition of ∫fdμ\int f d \mu for nonnegative ff. The only problem with (15.10), however, is that it treats infinity the wrong way. To see this, and to focus on essentials, assume that μ(Ω)<∞\mu (\Omega )<\infty and that ff is bounded, although not necessarily nonnegative or measurable F\mathscr {F}.

?
Problem 15.2
?
(a)

Show that

∑i[inf⁡ω∈Aif(ω)]μ(Ai)≤∑j[inf⁡ω∈Bif(ω)]μ(Bj) \sum _{i}\left[\inf _{\omega \in A_{i}} f(\omega )\right] \mu \left(A_{i}\right) \leq \sum _{j}\left[\inf _{\omega \in B_{i}} f(\omega )\right] \mu \left(B_{j}\right)

if {Bj}\left\{ B_{j}\right\} refines (Ai)\left(A_{i}\right). Prove a dual relation for the sums in (15.10) and conclude that

∫∗fdμ≤∫∗fdμ(15.11) \int _{*} f d \mu \leq \int ^{*} f d \mu \tag {15.11}
(b)

Now assume that ff is measurable F\mathscr {F} and let MM be a bound for ∣f∣\left|f\right|. Consider the partition Ai=[ω:iϵ<f(ω)≤(i+1)ϵ]A_{i}=[\omega : i \epsilon <f(\omega ) \leq (i+1) \epsilon ], where ii ranges from −N-N to NN and NN is large enough that Nϵ>MN \epsilon >M. Show that

∑i[sup⁡ω∈Aif(ω)]μ(Ai)−∑i[inf⁡ω∈Aif(ω)]μ(Ai)≤ϵμ(Ω). \sum _{i}\left[\sup _{\omega \in A_{i}} f(\omega )\right] \mu \left(A_{i}\right)-\sum _{i}\left[\inf _{\omega \in A_{i}} f(\omega )\right] \mu \left(A_{i}\right) \leq \epsilon \mu (\Omega ).

Conclude that

∫∗fdμ=∫∗fdμ(15.12) \int _{*} f d \mu =\int ^{*} f d \mu \tag {15.12}

To define the integral as the common value in (15.12) is the Darboux-Young approach. The advantage of (15.3) as a definition is that (in the nonnegative case) it applies at once to unbounded ff and infinite μ\mu

Problem 15.3

3.2 15.2 ↑ For A⊂ΩA \subset \Omega, define μ∗(A)\mu^{*}(A) and μ∗(A)\mu_{*}(A) by (3.9) and (3.10) with μ\mu in place of PP. Show that ∫∗IAdμ=μ∗(A)\int^{*} I_{A} d \mu =\mu^{*}(A) and ∫∗IAdμ=μ∗(A)\int_{*} I_{A} d \mu =\mu_{*}(A) for every AA. Therefore, (15.12) can fail if ff is not measurable F\mathscr {F}. (Where was measurability used in the proof of (15.12)?)

The definitions (15.3) and (15.6) always make formal sense (for finite μ(Ω)\mu (\Omega ) and supif D, but they are reasonable-accord with intuition-only if (15.12) holds. Under what conditions does it hold?

?
Problem 15.4

10.515.3↑10.515 .3 \uparrow

?
(a)

Suppose of ff that there exist an F-set AA and a function gg, measurable F\mathscr {F}, such that μ(A)=0\mu (A)=0 and [f≠g]⊂A[f \neq g] \subset A. This is the same thing as assuming that μ∗[f≠g]=0\mu^{*}[f \neq g]=0, or assuming that ff is measurable with respect to F\mathscr {F} completed with respect to μ\mu. Show that (15.12) holds.

(b)

Show that if (15.12) holds, then so does the italicized condition in part (a).

Rather than assume that ff is measurable F\mathscr {F}, one can assume that it satisfies the italicized condition in Problem 15.4(a)-which in case (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega , \mathscr {F}, \mu ) is complete is the same thing anyway. For the next three problems, assume that μ(Ω)<∞\mu (\Omega )<\infty and that ff is measurable F\mathscr {F} and bounded.

Problem 15.5

↑ Show that for positive ϵ\epsilon there exists a finite partition {Ai}\left\{ A_{i}\right\} such that, if {Bj}\left\{ B_{j}\right\} is any finer partition and ωj∈Bj\omega_{j} \in B_{j}, then

∣∫fdμ−∑jf(ωj)μ(Bj)∣<ϵ. \left|\int f d \mu -\sum _{j} f\left(\omega _{j}\right) \mu \left(B_{j}\right)\right|<\epsilon .
?
Problem 15.6

↑ Show that

∫fdμ=lim⁡n∑∣k∣≤n2nk−12nμ[ω:k−12n≤f(ω)<k2n]. \int f d \mu =\lim _{n} \sum _{\left|k\right| \leq n 2^{n}} \frac{k-1}{2^{n}} \mu \left[\omega : \frac{k-1}{2^{n}} \leq f(\omega )<\frac{k}{2^{n}}\right].

The limit on the right here is Lebesgue's definition of the integral.

?
Problem 15.7

↑ Suppose that the integral is defined for simple nonnegative functions by ∫(∑ixiIA)dμ=∑ixiμ(Ai)\int \left(\sum_{i} x_{i} I_{A}\right) d \mu =\sum_{i} x_{i} \mu \left(A_{i}\right). Suppose that fnf_{n} and gng_{n} are simple and nondecreasing and have a common limit: 0≤fn↑f0 \leq f_{n} \uparrow f and 0≤gn↑f0 \leq g_{n} \uparrow f. Adapt the arguments used to prove Theorem 15.1(iii) and show that lim⁡n∫fndμ=lim⁡n∫gndμ\lim_{n} \int f_{n} d \mu =\lim_{n} \int g_{n} d \mu. Thus, in the nonnegative case, ∫fdμ\int f d \mu can (Theorem 13.5) consistently be defined as lim⁡n∫fndμ\lim_{n} \int f_{n} d \mu for simple functions for which 0≤fn↑f0 \leq f_{n} \uparrow f.

?