Simple Random Variables
[20/30%]Show that is measurable with respect to the -field if and only if . Show that is measurable if and only if .
Show that, if , then is measurable if and only if is constant.
Suppose that is 0 or 1 for every in . This holds, for example, if is the tail field of an independent sequence (Theorem 4.5), or if consists of the countable and cocountable sets on the unit interval with Lebesgue measure. Show that if is measurable , then for some constant .
Show that the unit interval can be replaced by any nonatomic probability measure space in the proof of Theorem 5.3.
Show that minimizes .
Suppose that assumes the values with probabilities , and show that there is equality in (5.32). Thus Chebyshev's inequality cannot be improved without special assumptions on .
Suppose that has mean and variance .
Prove Cantelli's inequality
Show that . When is this better than Chebyshev's inequality?
By considering a random variable assuming two values, show that Cantelli's inequality is sharp.
The polynomial in has at most one real zero. Deduce Schwarz's inequality once more.
Write (5.37) in the form and deduce it directly from Jensen's inequality.
Prove that for and a positive random variable.
Let be a convex real function on a convex set in the plane Suppose that for all and prove a two-dimensional Jensen's mequality:
Show that is convex if it has continuous second derivatives that satisfy
Hölder's inequality is equivalent to , where and are nonnegative random variables. Derive this from (5.38).
↑ Minkowski's inequality is
valid for . It is enough to prove that for nonnegative and . Use (5.38).
For events , not necessarily independent, let be the number to occur among the first . Let
Show that
Thus if and only if , which holds if the are independent and (Bernoulli trials), because then and .
Show that, if has nonnegative integers as values, then .
Let be the indicators of events having union . Let , where the summation extends over all -tuples satisfying . Then are the terms in the inclusion-exclusion formula . Deduce the inclusion-exclusion formula from . Prove the latter formula by expanding the product
Let be or or 0 according as or or . This gives a standard example of a sequence of continuous functions that converges to 0 but not uniformly. Note that does not converge to 0 ; relate to Example 5.7.
By Theorem 5.3, for any prescribed sequence of probabilities , there exists (on some space) an independent sequence of events satisfying . Show that if but , this gives a counterexample (like Example 5.4) to the converse of Theorem 5.2(ii).
Suppose that and put . Show that, if converges, then on some discrete probability space there exist independent events satisfying . Compare Problem 1.1(b).
Suppose that and that is continuous. Show that .
Show that implies . Show that the converse is false.
The proof given for Theorem 5.3 for the special case where the are all the same can be extended to cover the general case: use Problem 2.20.
For integers and primes , let be the exact power of in the prime factorization of . Let be 1 or 0 as divides or not. Under each (see (2.34)) the and are random variables. Show that for distinct primes ,
and
Similarly,
According to (5.44), the are for large approximately independent under , and according to (5.45), the same is true of the .
For a function of positive integers, let
be its expected value under the probability measure . Show that
this says roughly that is the average power of in the factorization of large integers.
From Stirling's formula, deduce
From this, the inequality , and the relation , conclude that diverges and that there are infinitely many primes.
Let . Show that
Show that is always nonnegative and equals 1 in the range . Deduce and conclude that
Use this to estimate the error removing the integral-part brackets introduces into (5.49), and show that
Restrict the range of summation in (5.51) to for an appropriate , and conclude that
in the sense that the ratio of the two sides is bounded away from 0 and .
Use (5.52) and truncation arguments to prove for the number of primes not exceeding that
(By the prime number theorem the ratio of the two sides in fact goes to 1.) Conclude that the th prime satisfies and that