Chapter 35

Applications of weak convergence

[6/0%]
LaTeX
Problem 35.1

Prove Lemma 35.8.

Lemma 35.8: Suppose SnS_{n} is a binomial random variable with parameters nn and pp. Then there exists a constant cc not depending on nn or pp such that

E[∣Sn−E[Sn]∣4]≤cnp+cn2p2(35.8) \mathbb {E}\left[\left|S_{n}-\mathbb {E}\left[S_{n}\right]\right|^{4}\right] \leq c n p+c n^{2} p^{2} \tag {35.8}

and

E[∣Sn∣4]≤cnp+cn4p4.(35.9) \mathbb {E}\left[\left|S_{n}\right|^{4}\right] \leq c n p+c n^{4} p^{4}. \tag {35.9}
?
Problem 35.2

Prove that the finite-dimensional distributions of ZnZ_{n} in Theorem 35.10 converge to those of a Brownian bridge.

Setup: let Xi,i=1,…,nX_{i}, i=1, \ldots , n, be i.i.d. random variables uniformly distributed on [0,1][0,1], let Fn(t)=1n∑i=1n  1[0,t](Xi)F_{n}(t)=\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \; \mathbb {1}_{[0, t]}\left(X_{i}\right) be the empirical process, and let

Zn(t)=n(Fn(t)−t)=1n∑i=1n(  1[0,t](Xi)−t). Z_{n}(t)=\sqrt{n}\left(F_{n}(t)-t\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \sum _{i=1}^{n}\left(\; \mathbb {1}_{[0, t]}\left(X_{i}\right)-t\right).

Theorem 35.10: The ZnZ_{n} converge weakly to a Brownian bridge with respect to the topology of D[0,1]D[0,1].

?
Problem 35.3

If Wt0W_{t}^{0} is a Brownian bridge, prove that Yt=W1−t0Y_{t}=W_{1-t}^{0} is also a Brownian bridge.

?
Problem 35.4

Let t0<1t_{0}<1. The SDE (35.5) has a unique solution when X0=0X_{0}=0 is replaced by X0=xX_{0}=x. Let P[x]\mathbb {P}[x] be the law of the solution when X0=xX_{0}=x and let ZtZ_{t} be the canonical process. Show that (Zt,P[x])\left(Z_{t}, \mathbb {P}[x]\right) is not a Markov process.

?
Problem 35.5

Let Nt(A)N_{t}(A) be a Poisson point process with respect to the measure space (S,m)(\mathcal{S}, m) and let As,s>0A_{s}, s>0, be an increasing sequence of subsets of S\mathcal{S} with m(As)→∞m\left(A_{s}\right) \rightarrow \infty as s→∞s \rightarrow \infty. Does

Nt(As)−m(As)m(As) \frac{N_{t}\left(A_{s}\right)-m\left(A_{s}\right)}{\sqrt{m\left(A_{s}\right)}}

converge weakly with respect to D[0,1]D[0,1] as s→∞s \rightarrow \infty ? What is the limit?

This can be applied to get central limit theorems for the number of downcrossings of a Brownian motion, for example.

?
Problem 35.6

This exercise asks you to prove that the Poisson process conditioned to be equal to nn at time 1 has the same law as nn times the empirical process. Here is the precise statement. Suppose PtP_{t} is a Poisson process with parameter λ>0\lambda >0. Let Q\mathbb {Q} be the law of {Pt,t∈[0,1]}\left\{ P_{t}, t \in [0,1]\right\} conditioned so that P1=nP_{1}=n. Thus Q\mathbb {Q} is a probability on D[0,1]D[0,1] with

Q(P∈A)=P(P∈A∣P1=n). \mathbb {Q}(P \in A)=\mathbb {P}\left( P \in A \mid P_{1}=n \right) .

Since (P1=n)\left(P_{1}=n\right) is an event with positive probability, there is no difficulty defining these conditional probabilities. Prove that Q\mathbb {Q} is also the law of {nFn(t),t∈[0,1]}\left\{ n F_{n}(t), t \in [0,1]\right\}, where FnF_{n} is defined in Section 35.3.

?