Weak solutions of SDEs
[6/0%]Show weak existence holds under the hypotheses of Proposition 25.3.
Show weak existence holds under the hypotheses of Proposition 25.4.
Here is an example of an SDE where weak uniqueness does not hold. Suppose is a one-dimensional Brownian motion and . Let . Find two solutions to
that are not equal in law.
Hint: One is the solution that is identically zero. The other can be constructed by time changing a Brownian motion by the inverse of the increasing process
Suppose and are bounded predictable processes with bounded below by a positive constant. Let be a one-dimensional Brownian motion. Suppose is a one-dimensional semimartingale such that
Prove that if and , there exists a constant depending only on , and the bounds on and such that
Now let be -dimensional Brownian motion, let , and let be a matrix-valued function that is bounded and such that is positive definite, uniformly in . That is, there exists such that for all ,
Let be a matrix-valued function that is bounded. Let be the solution to
Use Itô's formula to find an equivalent expression for . Then use (1) to prove that if and , there exists a constant not depending on such that
This is the support theorem for solutions to SDEs. Let , and be as in (2) of Exercise 25.4. Suppose is a continuous function with . Use the Girsanov theorem to prove that there exists such that
Suppose weak uniqueness holds for the one-dimensional stochastic differential equation
where is a one-dimensional Brownian motion. Suppose also that there exists a process that is adapted to the minimal augmented filtration of with and . Prove that pathwise uniqueness holds for (25.8).
Hint: Show there exists a measurable map from such that . If is another solution to (25.8), then weak uniqueness shows that the laws of and are equal, hence .