Section 11.4

Fredholm theory

[25/20%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 11.65

Prove that similar operators in Banach spaces are either both Fredholm with equal indices, or both not Fredholm.

?
Problem 11.66

Prove that every invertible operator in a Banach space is Fredholm.

?
Problem 11.67

Let XX and YY be Banach spaces, A∈K(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{K}(X, Y). Prove that A∈F(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y) if and only if both spaces XX and YY are finite-dimensional.

?
Problem 11.68

Let XX be a Banach space and let AA be a Fredholm operator in XX. Prove that then the operator A′A^{\prime } is also Fredholm and α(A′)=β(A),β(A′)=α(A)\alpha \left(A^{\prime }\right) = \beta (A), \beta \left(A^{\prime }\right) = \alpha (A).

?
Problem 11.69

Prove Theorems 11.5-11.8 for the case of a Hilbert space HH and a finite-dimensional operator A∈B(H)A \in \mathcal{B}(H).

Notation: for an operator A∈K(X)A \in \mathcal{K}(X) on a Banach space XX and the adjoint operator A′∈K(X∗)A^{\prime } \in \mathcal{K}\left(X^{*}\right) one considers four equations: (1) (I−A)x=y(I-A) x = y; (2) (I−A′)f=g\left(I-A^{\prime }\right) f = g; (3) (I−A)x=0(I-A) x = 0; (4) (I−A′)f=0\left(I-A^{\prime }\right) f = 0. Let M=Ker⁡(I−A)M = \operatorname {Ker}(I-A) (the solutions of equation (3)) and N=Ker⁡(I−A′)N = \operatorname {Ker}\left(I-A^{\prime }\right) (the solutions of equation (4)). For a pair x∈Xx \in X, f∈X∗f \in X^{*} one writes x⊥fx \perp f if f(x)=0f(x) = 0.

Theorem 11.5 (F. Riesz, 1918): If A∈K(X)A \in \mathcal{K}(X), then the operator I−AI-A is Fredholm.

Theorem 11.6 (first Fredholm theorem): Equation (1) (respectively, equation (2)) has a solution if and only if y⊥Ny \perp N (respectively, f⊥Mf \perp M).

Theorem 11.7 (second Fredholm theorem, or the Fredholm alternative): Either equation (1) (respectively, equation (2)) has a solution for every right-hand side, or equation (3) (respectively, equation (4)) has a nonzero solution.

Theorem 11.8 (third Fredholm theorem): dim⁡M=dim⁡N<∞\dim M = \dim N < \infty.

?
Problem 11.70

Prove the first Fredholm theorem 11.6 for the case of a Hilbert space.

Theorem 11.6 (first Fredholm theorem): Let A∈K(X)A \in \mathcal{K}(X), A′A^{\prime } the adjoint operator, M=Ker⁡(I−A)M = \operatorname {Ker}(I-A), N=Ker⁡(I−A′)N = \operatorname {Ker}\left(I-A^{\prime }\right). The equation (I−A)x=y(I-A) x = y (respectively, the equation (I−A′)f=g\left(I-A^{\prime }\right) f = g) has a solution if and only if y⊥Ny \perp N (respectively, f⊥Mf \perp M). Here for a pair x∈Xx \in X, f∈X∗f \in X^{*} one writes x⊥fx \perp f if f(x)=0f(x) = 0.

?
Remark.
?

In an arbitrary Banach space the method used in the previous problem to prove the Fredholm theorems is not applicable, since the space may fail to have the approximation property (see Theorem 11.2).

Theorem 11.2 (P. Enflo, 1972): There exist separable Banach spaces without the approximation property. These spaces have no Schauder basis. Here (Definition 11.3) a space XX is said to have the approximation property if for every Banach space YY and every compact operator A∈K(Y,X)A \in \mathcal{K}(Y, X) there is a sequence of finite-dimensional operators {An}1∞\left\{ A_{n}\right\}_{1}^{\infty } converging to AA in the norm of B(Y,X)\mathcal{B}(Y, X).

Problem 11.71

The statements of problems 11.71-11.75 contain theorems from the beginning of Section 11.4; this problem must be solved without using Theorems 11.3-11.8 (their statements are given in problems 11.69, 11.74 and 11.79).

Let XX be a Banach space, A∈K(X)A \in \mathcal{K}(X) and T=I−AT = I-A. Prove that α(T)<∞\alpha (T) < \infty.

?
Problem 11.72

The statements of problems 11.71-11.75 contain theorems from the beginning of Section 11.4; this problem must be solved without using Theorems 11.3-11.8 (their statements are given in problems 11.69, 11.74 and 11.79).

Let XX be a Banach space, A∈K(X)A \in \mathcal{K}(X) and T=I−AT = I-A. Prove that the subspace Im⁡T\operatorname {Im} T is closed in XX.

?
Problem 11.73

The statements of problems 11.71-11.75 contain theorems from the beginning of Section 11.4; this problem must be solved without using Theorems 11.3-11.8 (their statements are given in problems 11.69, 11.74 and 11.79).

Let XX be a Banach space, A∈K(X)A \in \mathcal{K}(X) and T=I−AT = I-A. Prove that β(T)<∞\beta (T) < \infty.

?
Problem 11.74

The statements of problems 11.71-11.75 contain theorems from the beginning of Section 11.4; this problem must be solved without using Theorems 11.3-11.8 (their statements are given in problems 11.69, 11.74 and 11.79).

Prove Theorem 11.3.

Theorem 11.3: If XX and YY are Banach spaces and A∈F(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y) (that is, A∈B(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{B}(X, Y) is a Fredholm operator: the numbers α(A)=dim⁡Ker⁡A\alpha (A) = \dim \operatorname {Ker} A and β(A)=codim⁡Im⁡A\beta (A) = \operatorname {codim} \operatorname {Im} A are finite), then Im⁡A\operatorname {Im} A is closed (see problem 9.15).

?
Problem 11.75

The statements of problems 11.71-11.75 contain theorems from the beginning of Section 11.4; this problem must be solved without using Theorems 11.3-11.8 (their statements are given in problems 11.69, 11.74 and 11.79).

Let XX be a Banach space, A∈K(X)A \in \mathcal{K}(X) and T=I−AT = I-A. Prove that:

?
(a)

TT has finite ascent and equal finite descent mm;

(b)

for all natural kk the kernels Ker⁡(Tk)\operatorname {Ker}\left(T^{k}\right) are finite-dimensional, and the images Im⁡(Tk)\operatorname {Im}\left(T^{k}\right) are closed (see problems 6.54 and 6.56).

Problem 11.76

Let X,YX, Y and ZZ be Banach spaces, A∈F(Y,Z)A \in \mathcal{F}(Y, Z), B∈F(X,Y)B \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y). Prove that AB∈F(X,Z)A B \in \mathcal{F}(X, Z) and ind (AB)=(A B) = ind A+A+ ind BB.

?
Problem 11.77

Let XX and YY be Banach spaces, A∈IB(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{I B}(X, Y) an invertible operator, T∈K(X,Y)T \in \mathcal{K}(X, Y). Prove that A+T∈F(X,Y)A+T \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y) and

ind⁡(A+T)=0 \operatorname {ind}(A+T) = 0
?
Problem 11.78

Let XX and YY be Banach spaces, A∈F(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y) and ind A=0A = 0. Without using Theorem 11.4, prove F. Riesz's decomposition theorem: there exists an invertible operator R∈IB(X,Y)R \in \mathcal{I B}(X, Y) and a finite-dimensional operator SS such that A=R+SA = R+S.

Theorem 11.4 (S. M. Nikol'skii, 1943): Let X,YX, Y be Banach spaces. An operator A∈B(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{B}(X, Y) is Fredholm if and only if it is almost invertible, that is, there exist operators R,L∈B(Y,X)R, L \in \mathcal{B}(Y, X) such that LA=IX+K1L A = I_{X}+K_{1}, AR=IY+K2A R = I_{Y}+K_{2}, where K1∈K(X)K_{1} \in \mathcal{K}(X), K2∈K(Y)K_{2} \in \mathcal{K}(Y). Moreover, the operators RR and LL can be chosen equal and such that K1K_{1} and K2K_{2} are finite-rank (finite-dimensional) operators.

?
Problem 11.79

Prove Theorem 11.4.

Definition 11.5: Let X,YX, Y be Banach spaces. An operator A∈B(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{B}(X, Y) is called almost invertible if there exist operators R∈B(Y,X)R \in \mathcal{B}(Y, X), L∈B(Y,X)L \in \mathcal{B}(Y, X) such that LA=IX+K1L A = I_{X} + K_{1}, AR=IY+K2A R = I_{Y} + K_{2}, where K1∈K(X)K_{1} \in \mathcal{K}(X), K2∈K(Y)K_{2} \in \mathcal{K}(Y).

Theorem 11.4 (S. M. Nikol'skii, 1943): Let X,YX, Y be Banach spaces. An operator A∈B(X,Y)A \in \mathcal{B}(X, Y) is Fredholm (that is, dim⁡Ker⁡A<∞\dim \operatorname {Ker} A < \infty and codim⁡Im⁡A<∞\operatorname {codim} \operatorname {Im} A < \infty) if and only if it is almost invertible. Moreover, the operators RR and LL can be chosen equal and such that K1K_{1} and K2K_{2} are finite-rank (finite-dimensional) operators.

?
Problem 11.80

(First index stability theorem). Let XX and YY be Banach spaces, S∈F(X,Y),T∈K(X,Y)S \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y), T \in \mathcal{K}(X, Y). Prove that S+T∈F(X,Y)S+T \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y) and

ind⁡(S+T)=ind⁡S \operatorname {ind}(S+T) = \operatorname {ind} S
?
Problem 11.81

(Second index stability theorem). Let XX and YY be Banach spaces, S∈F(X,Y)S \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y). Prove that there exists ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that for every operator T∈B(X,Y)T \in \mathcal{B}(X, Y) with ∥T∥<ε\left\| T\right\| < \varepsilon the inclusion S+T∈F(X,Y)S+T \in \mathcal{F}(X, Y) holds together with the equality ind⁡(S+T)=ind⁡S\operatorname {ind}(S+T) = \operatorname {ind} S.

?
Problem 11.82

Let X⊂YX \subset Y be Banach spaces. Prove that the embedding operator J:X→YJ: X \rightarrow Y is Fredholm if and only if the codimension of the linear space XX in YY is finite.

?
Problem 11.83

Prove that a projection operator in a Banach space is Fredholm if and only if its image has finite codimension.

?
Problem 11.84

Prove that the following operators are Fredholm:

?
(a)

(Ax)(t)=x′(t);A:C1[0,1]→C[0,1](A x)(t) = x^{\prime }(t) ; A: C^{1}[0,1] \rightarrow C[0,1];

(b)

(Ax)(t)=∫0tx(s)ds;A:C[0,1]→C1[0,1](A x)(t) = \int_{0}^{t} x(s) d s ; A: C[0,1] \rightarrow C^{1}[0,1].

Find the numbers α(A),β(A)\alpha (A), \beta (A) and ind⁡A\operatorname {ind} A.

Problem 11.85

Under what conditions on the sequence {λn}1∞∈l∞\left\{ \lambda_{n}\right\}_{1}^{\infty } \in l_{\infty } is the operator Ax=(λ1x1,λ2x2,…,λnxn,…)A x = \left(\lambda_{1} x_{1}, \lambda_{2} x_{2}, \ldots , \lambda_{n} x_{n}, \ldots \right) in lpl_{p}, where 1⩽p<∞1 \leqslant p < \infty, a Fredholm operator? In those cases where the operator is Fredholm, compute α(A),β(A)\alpha (A), \beta (A) and ind AA.

?
Problem 11.86

Under what conditions on the function aa is the operator (Ax)(t)=a(t)x(t)(A x)(t) = a(t) x(t) Fredholm:

?
(a)

in L2[0,1](a∈L∞[0,1])L_{2}[0,1]\left(a \in L_{\infty }[0,1]\right);

(b)

in C[0,1](a∈C[0,1])C[0,1](a \in C[0,1])?

In those cases where the operator is Fredholm, compute α(A),β(A)\alpha (A), \beta (A) and ind AA.

Problem 11.87

Prove that the operators of right and left shift in any of the spaces lp,p∈[1,∞]l_{p}, p \in [1, \infty ], cc or c0c_{0} are Fredholm. Compute the deficiency numbers and index for these operators.

?
Problem 11.88

Prove that the operator (Ax)(t)=x(t+a)(A x)(t) = x(t+a) is Fredholm in any of the spaces Lp(R),p∈[1,∞],BC(R)L_{p}(\mathbb {R}), p \in [1, \infty ], B C(\mathbb {R}). Compute α(A)\alpha (A), β(A)\beta (A) and ind⁡A\operatorname {ind} A for this operator in each of the indicated spaces.

?
Problem 11.89

Let {en}1∞\left\{ e_{n}\right\}_{1}^{\infty } be an orthonormal basis in a Hilbert space HH, and let the system {xn}1∞\left\{ x_{n}\right\}_{1}^{\infty } be quadratically close to it, i.e., ∑n=1∞∥xn−en∥2<∞\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty }\left\| x_{n}-e_{n}\right\|^{2} < \infty. Prove that under these conditions the following statements are equivalent:

  1. the system {xn}1∞\left\{ x_{n}\right\}_{1}^{\infty } is complete;

  2. the system {xn}1∞\left\{ x_{n}\right\}_{1}^{\infty } is minimal;

  3. the system {xn}1∞\left\{ x_{n}\right\}_{1}^{\infty } is a Riesz basis. 1

Footnotes

  1. Compare with problems 3.68 and 10.64. ↩

?