Differentiation
[24/0%]Suppose is a measure space and is an -measurable function. Prove that
for all positive numbers and .
Suppose is a measure space with and . Prove that
for all .
The result above is called Chebyshev's inequality; it plays an important role in probability theory. Pafnuty Chebyshev (1821--1894) was Markov's thesis advisor.
Suppose is a measure space. Suppose and . Prove that there is at most one number such that
Show that the constant 3 in the Vitali Covering Lemma (4.4) cannot be replaced by a smaller positive constant.
4.4 (Vitali Covering Lemma): Suppose is a list of bounded nonempty open intervals of . Then there exists a disjoint sublist such that , where denotes the open interval with the same center as and three times the length.
Prove the assertion left as an exercise in the last sentence of the proof of the Vitali Covering Lemma (4.4).
The proof of the Vitali Covering Lemma (4.4) constructs, from a list of bounded nonempty open intervals of , a disjoint sublist by repeatedly choosing the largest remaining interval disjoint from those already chosen. For not among , let be the first interval on this sublist not disjoint from ; thus is disjoint from . Because was not chosen in step , . The assertion to be proved is that because , this last inequality implies (where denotes the open interval with the same center as and three times the length).
Verify the formula in Example 4.7 for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function of .
Example 4.7: for the characteristic function of the interval ,
Find a formula for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function of the characteristic function of .
Find a formula for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function of the function defined by
Suppose is Lebesgue measurable. Prove that
is an open subset of for every .
Prove or give a counterexample: If is an increasing function, then is an increasing function.
Give an example of a Borel measurable function such that for all but .
Show that for every .
Show that there exists such that for every .
Suppose . Prove that
for every .
This result slightly strengthens the Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality (4.8) because the set on the left side above includes those such that . A much deeper strengthening comes from replacing the constant 3 in the Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality with a smaller constant. In 2003, Antonios Melas answered what had been an open question about the best constant. He proved that the smallest constant that can replace 3 in the Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality is ; see Annals of Mathematics 157 (2003), 647--688.
For and an interval of with , let denote the average of on . In other words, .
Suppose . Prove that
for almost every .
For and an interval of with , let denote the average of on . In other words, .
Suppose . Prove that
for almost every .
Suppose is a Lebesgue measurable function such that . Prove that
for almost every .
Prove that the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem (4.19) still holds if the hypothesis that is weakened to the requirement that for all .
4.19 (Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem, second version): Suppose . Define by . Then for almost every .
Suppose is a Lebesgue measurable function. Prove that
for almost every .
Prove that if and for all , then for almost every .
Give an example of a Borel subset of whose density at 0 is not defined.
Give an example of a Borel subset of whose density at 0 is .
Prove that if , then there exists a Borel set such that the density of at 0 is .
Suppose is a Lebesgue measurable subset of such that the density of equals 1 at every element of and equals 0 at every element of . Prove that or .