Chapter 4

Differentiation

[34/0%]
Show
LaTeX
Problem 4.1

Show that in the proof of Theorem 4.1.1, μ(A3)=0\mu \left(A_{3}\right) = 0 where A3={g∉[0,1]}A_{3} = \left\{ g \notin [0,1]\right\} and gg satisfies (1.9).

?
Problem 4.2

Verify that μ1s\mu_{1 s}, defined in (1.14) and μ2\mu_{2} are singular.

?
Problem 4.3

Let ν\nu be the counting measure on [0,1][0,1] and ∫[0,1]hdν<∞\int_{[0,1]} h d \nu < \infty for some nonnegative function hh. Show that B={x:h(x)>0}B = \left\{ x: h(x) > 0\right\} is countable.

?
Problem 4.4

Prove Proposition 4.1.2.

?
Problem 4.5

Find the Lebesgue decomposition of μ\mu w.r.t. ν\nu and the RadonNikodym derivative dμadν\frac{d \mu_{a}}{d \nu } in the following cases where μa\mu_{a} is the absolutely continuous component of μ\mu w.r.t. ν\nu.

?
(a)

μ=N(0,1),ν=Exp⁡(1)\mu = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right), \nu = \operatorname {Exp}\left(1\right)

(b)

μ=Exp⁡(1),ν=N(0,1)\mu = \operatorname {Exp}\left(1\right), \nu = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right)

(c)

μ=μ1+μ2\mu = \mu_{1}+\mu_{2}, where μ1=N(0,1),μ2=Pois⁡(1)\mu_{1} = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right), \mu_{2} = \operatorname {Pois}\left(1\right) and ν=Cauchy⁡(0,1)\nu = \operatorname {Cauchy}\left(0,1\right).

(d)

μ=μ1+μ2,ν=Geom⁡(p),0<p<1\mu = \mu_{1}+\mu_{2}, \nu = \operatorname {Geom}\left(p\right), 0 < p < 1, where μ1=N(0,1)\mu_{1} = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right) and μ2=\mu_{2} = Pois1.

(e)

μ=μ1+μ2,ν=ν1+ν2\mu = \mu_{1}+\mu_{2}, \nu = \nu_{1}+\nu_{2} where μ1=N(0,1),μ2=Pois⁡(1)\mu_{1} = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right), \mu_{2} = \operatorname {Pois}\left(1\right), ν1=Cauchy⁡(0,1)\nu_{1} = \operatorname {Cauchy}\left(0,1\right) and ν2=Geom⁡(p),0<p<1\nu_{2} = \operatorname {Geom}\left(p\right), 0 < p < 1.

(f)

μ=Bin⁡(10,1/2),ν=\mu = \operatorname {Bin}\left(10, 1 / 2\right), \nu = Pois1.

The measures referred to above are defined in Tables 4.6.1 and 4.6.2, given at the end of this section.

Problem 4.6

Let (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \mu ) be a measure space and f∈L1(Ω,F,μ)f \in L^{1}(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \mu ). Let

νf(A)≡∫Afdμ for all A∈F \nu _{f}(A) \equiv \int _{A} f d \mu \quad \text{ for all } \quad A \in \mathcal{F}
?
(a)

Show that νf\nu_{f} is a finite signed measure.

(b)

Show that ∥ν∥=∫Ω∣f∣dμ\left\| \nu \right\| = \int_{\Omega }\left|f\right| d \mu and for A∈F,νf+(A)=∫Af+dμA \in \mathcal{F}, \nu_{f}^{+}(A) = \int_{A} f^{+} d \mu, νf−(A)=∫Afdμ\nu_{f}^{-}(A) = \int_{A} f d \mu, and ∣νf∣(A)=∫A∣f∣(dμ)\left|\nu_{f}\right|(A) = \int_{A}\left|f\right|(d \mu ).

Problem 4.7
?
(a)

Let μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} be two finite measures such that both are dominated by a σ\sigma-finite measure ν\nu. Show that the total variation measure of the signed measure μ≡μ1−μ2\mu \equiv \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} is given by ∣μ∣(A)=∫A∣h1−h2∣dν\left|\mu \right|(A) = \int_{A}\left|h_{1}-h_{2}\right| d \nu where for i=1,2,hi=dμidνi = 1,2, h_{i} = \frac{d \mu_{i}}{d \nu }.

(b)

Conclude that if μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} are two measures on a countable set Ω≡{ωi}i≥1\Omega \equiv \left\{ \omega_{i}\right\}_{i \geq 1} with F≡P(Ω)\mathcal{F} \equiv \mathcal{P}(\Omega ), then ∣μ∣(A)=∑i∈A∣μ1(ωi)−μ2(ωi)∣\left|\mu \right|(A) = \sum_{i \in A} \mid \mu_{1}\left(\omega_{i}\right)- \mu_{2}\left(\omega_{i}\right) \mid.

(c)

Show that if μn\mu_{n} is the Binomial (n,pn)\left(n, p_{n}\right) measure and μ\mu is the Poisson (λ)(\lambda ) measure, 0<λ<∞0 < \lambda < \infty, then as n→∞,∣μn−μ∣(⋅)→0n \rightarrow \infty ,\left|\mu_{n}-\mu \right|(\cdot ) \rightarrow 0 uniformly on P(Z+)\mathcal{P}\left(\mathbb {Z}_{+}\right)iff npn→λn p_{n} \rightarrow \lambda. (Hint: Show that for each i∈Z+≡{0,1,2,…},μn({i})→μ({i})i \in \mathbb {Z}_{+} \equiv \left\{ 0,1,2, \ldots \right\} , \mu_{n}(\left\{ i\right\} ) \rightarrow \mu (\left\{ i\right\} ) and use Scheffe's theorem.)

Problem 4.8

Let ν\nu be a finite signed measure on a measurable space (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}) and let ∣ν∣\left|\nu \right| be the total variation measure corresponding to ν\nu. Show that for any B∈Ω+,B⊂FB \in \Omega^{+}, B \subset \mathcal{F},

∣ν∣(B)=ν(B) |\nu |(B) = \nu (B)

where Ω+\Omega^{+}is as defined in (2.13).

?
Problem 4.9

Show that the Banach space S\mathbb {S} of finite signed measures on (N,P(N))(\mathbb {N}, \mathcal{P}(\mathbb {N})) is isomorphic to ℓ1\ell_{1}, the Banach space of absolutely convergent sequences {xn}n≥1\left\{ x_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} in R\mathbb {R}.

?
Problem 4.10

Let μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} be two probability measures on (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}).

?
(a)

Show that

∥μ1−μ2∥=2sup⁡{∣μ1(A)−μ2(A)∣:A∈F} \left\| \mu _{1}-\mu _{2}\right\| = 2 \sup \left\{ \left|\mu _{1}(A)-\mu _{2}(A)\right|: A \in \mathcal{F}\right\}

(Hint: For any A∈F,{A,Ac}A \in \mathcal{F},\left\{ A, A^{c}\right\} is a partition of Ω\Omega and so ∥μ1−μ2∥≥∣μ1(A)−μ2(A)∣+∣μ1(Ac)−μ2(Ac)∣=2∣μ1(A)−μ2(A)∣\left\| \mu_{1}- \mu_{2} \right\| \geq \left|\mu_{1}(A)-\mu_{2}(A)\right|+\left|\mu_{1}\left(A^{c}\right)-\mu_{2}\left(A^{c}\right)\right| = 2\left|\mu_{1}(A)-\mu_{2}(A)\right|, since μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} are probability measures. For the opposite inequality, use the Hahn decomposition of Ω\Omega w.r.t. μ1−μ2\mu_{1}-\mu_{2} and the fact ∥μ1−μ2∥=∣(μ1−μ2)(Ω+)∣+∣(μ1−μ2)(Ω−)∣\left\| \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right\| = \left|\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\left(\Omega^{+}\right)\right|+\left|\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\left(\Omega^{-}\right)\right|. ))

(b)

Show that ∥μ1−μ2∥\left\| \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right\| is also equal to

sup⁡{∣∫fdμ1−∫fdμ2∣:f∈B(Ω,R)} \sup \left\{ \left|\int f d \mu _{1}-\int f d \mu _{2}\right|: f \in B(\Omega , \mathbb {R})\right\}

where B(Ω,R)B(\Omega , \mathbb {R}) is the collection of all F\mathcal{F}-measurable functions from Ω\Omega to R\mathbb {R} such that sup⁡{∣f(ω)∣:ω∈Ω}≤1\sup \left\{ \left|f(\omega )\right|: \omega \in \Omega \right\} \leq 1.

Problem 4.11

Let (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}) be a measurable space.

?
(a)

Let {μn}n≥1\left\{ \mu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} be a sequence of finite measures on (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}). Show that there exists a probability measure λ\lambda such that μn≪λ\mu_{n} \ll \lambda. (Hint: Consider λ(⋅)=∑n=1∞12nμn(⋅)μn(Ω).\lambda (\cdot ) = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty } \frac{1}{2^{n}} \frac{\mu_{n}(\cdot )}{\mu_{n}(\Omega )}.)

(b)

Extend (a) to the case where {μn}n≥1\left\{ \mu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} are σ\sigma-finite.

(c)

Conclude that for any sequence {νn}n≥1\left\{ \nu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} of finite signed measures on (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}), there exists a probability measure λ\lambda such that ∣νn∣≪λ\left|\nu_{n}\right| \ll \lambda for all n≥1n \geq 1.

Problem 4.12

Let {μn}n≥1\left\{ \mu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} be a sequence of finite measures on a measurable space (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}). Show that there exists a finite measure μ\mu on (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}) such that ∥μn−μ∥→0\left\| \mu_{n}-\mu \right\| \rightarrow 0 iff there is a finite measure λ\lambda dominating μ\mu and μn\mu_{n}, n≥1n \geq 1 such that the Radon-Nikodym derivatives fn≡dμndλ→f≡dμdλf_{n} \equiv \frac{d \mu_{n}}{d \lambda } \rightarrow f \equiv \frac{d \mu }{d \lambda } in measure on (Ω,F,λ)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \lambda ) and μn(Ω)→μ(Ω)\mu_{n}(\Omega ) \rightarrow \mu (\Omega ).

?
Problem 4.13
?
(a)

Let μ1\mu_{1} and μ2\mu_{2} be two finite measures on (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}). Let μ1=μ1a+μ1s\mu_{1} = \mu_{1 a}+ \mu_{1 s} be the Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym decomposition of μ1\mu_{1} w.r.t. μ2\mu_{2} as in Theorem 4.1.1. Show that if μ=μ1−μ2\mu = \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}, then for all A∈FA \in \mathcal{F},

∣μ∣(A)=∫A∣h−1∣dμ2+μ1s(A) where h=dμ1adμ2 |\mu |(A) = \int _{A}|h-1| d \mu _{2}+\mu _{1 s}(A) \quad \text{ where } \quad h = \frac{d \mu _{1 a}}{d \mu _{2}}

is the Radon-Nikodym derivative of μ1a\mu_{1 a} w.r.t. μ2\mu_{2}. Conclude that if μ1⊥μ2\mu_{1} \perp \mu_{2}, then ∣μ∣(⋅)=μ1(⋅)+μ2(⋅)\left|\mu \right|(\cdot ) = \mu_{1}(\cdot )+\mu_{2}(\cdot ) and if μ1≪μ2\mu_{1} \ll \mu_{2}, then ∣μ∣(A)=∫A∣dμ1dμ2−1∣dμ2\left|\mu \right|(A) = \int_{A}\left|\frac{d \mu_{1}}{d \mu_{2}}-1\right| d \mu_{2}.

(b)

Compute ∣μ∣(⋅),∥μ∥\left|\mu \right|(\cdot ),\left\| \mu \right\| if μ=μ1−μ2\mu = \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} for the following cases

  1. μ1=N(0,1),μ2=N(1,1)\mu_{1} = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right), \mu_{2} = \mathscr {N}\left(1, 1\right)

  2. μ1=Cauchy⁡(0,1),μ2=N(0,1)\mu_{1} = \operatorname {Cauchy}\left(0,1\right), \mu_{2} = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right)

  3. μ1=N(0,1),μ2=Pois⁡(λ)\mu_{1} = \mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right), \mu_{2} = \operatorname {Pois}\left(\lambda \right).

(c)

Establish Proposition 4.2.7.

Problem 4.14

Give another proof of the completeness of (S,∥⋅∥)(\mathbb {S},\left\| \cdot \right\| ) by verifying the following steps.

?
(a)

For any sequence {νn}n≥1\left\{ \nu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} in S\mathbb {S}, there is a finite measure λ\lambda and {fn}n≥1⊂L1(Ω,F,λ)\left\{ f_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} \subset L^{1}(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \lambda ) such that

νn(A)=∫Afndλ for all A∈F, for all n≥1 \nu _{n}(A) = \int _{A} f_{n} d \lambda \quad \text{ for all } \quad A \in \mathcal{F}, \quad \text{ for all } \quad n \geq 1
(b)

{νn}n≥1\left\{ \nu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} Cauchy in S\mathbb {S} is the same as {fn}n≥1\left\{ f_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} Cauchy in L1(Ω,F,λ)L^{1}(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \lambda ) and hence, the completeness of (S,∥⋅∥)(\mathbb {S},\left\| \cdot \right\| ) follows from the completeness of L1(Ω,F,λ)L^{1}(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \lambda ).

Problem 4.15

Let f,g∈BV[a,b]f, g \in B V[a, b].

?
(a)

Show that P(f+g;[a,b])≤P(f;[a,b])+P(g;[a,b])P(f+g ;[a, b]) \leq P(f ;[a, b])+P(g ;[a, b]) and that the same is true for N(⋅;⋅)N(\cdot ; \cdot ) and T(⋅;⋅)T(\cdot ; \cdot ).

(b)

Show that for any c∈Rc \in \mathbb {R},

P(cf;[a,b])=∣c∣P(f;[a,b]) P(c f ;[a, b]) = \left|c\right| P(f ;[a, b])

and do the same for N(⋅;⋅)N(\cdot ; \cdot ) and T(⋅;⋅)T(\cdot ; \cdot ).

(c)

For any a<c<b,P(f;[a,b])=P(f;[a,c])+P(f;[c,b])a < c < b, P(f ;[a, b]) = P(f ;[a, c])+P(f ;[c, b]).

Problem 4.16

Let {fn}n≥1⊂BV[a,b]\left\{ f_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} \subset B V[a, b] and let lim⁡nfn(x)=f(x)\lim_{n} f_{n}(x) = f(x) for all xx in [a,b][a, b]. Show that P(f;[a,b])≤lim⁡n→∞P(fn;[a,b])P(f ;[a, b]) \leq \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty } P(f_{n} ;[a, b]) and do the same for N(⋅;⋅)N(\cdot ; \cdot ) and T(⋅;⋅)T(\cdot ; \cdot ).

?
Problem 4.17

Let f∈BV[a,b]f \in B V[a, b]. Show that ff is continuous except on an at most countable set.

?
Problem 4.18

Let F:[a,b]→RF:[a, b] \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be a.c. Show that it is of bounded variation.

?
Problem 4.19

Let FF be an absolutely continuous nondecreasing function on R\mathbb {R}. Let μF\mu_{F} be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure corresponding to FF. Show that for any h∈L1(R,MμF,μF)h \in L^{1}\left(\mathbb {R}, \mathcal{M}_{\mu_{F}}, \mu_{F}\right),

∫RhdμF=∫hfdm \int _{\mathbb {R}} h d \mu _{F} = \int h f d m

where ff is a nonnegative measurable function such that F(b)−F(a)=∫[a,b]fdmF(b)-F(a) = \int_{[a, b]} f d m for any a<ba < b.

?
Problem 4.20

Let F:[a,b]→RF:[a, b] \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be absolutely continuous with F′(⋅)>0F^{\prime }(\cdot ) > 0 a.e. on [a,b][a, b], where −∞<a<b<∞-\infty < a < b < \infty. Let F(a)=cF(a) = c and F(b)=dF(b) = d. Let m(⋅)m(\cdot ) denote the Lebesgue measure on R\mathbb {R}. Show the following:

?
(a)

(Change of variables formula). For any g:[c,d]→Rg:[c, d] \rightarrow \mathbb {R} and Lebesgue measurable and integrable w.r.t. mm

∫[c,d]gdm=∫[a,b]g(F)F′dm \int _{[c, d]} g d m = \int _{[a, b]} g(F) F^{\prime } d m
(b)

For any Borel set E⊂[a,b],F(E)E \subset [a, b], F(E) is also a Borel set.

(c)

ν(⋅)≡m(F(⋅))\nu (\cdot ) \equiv m(F(\cdot )) is a measure on B([a,b])\mathcal{B}([a, b]) and ν≪m\nu \ll m with

dνdm(⋅)=F′(⋅) \frac{d \nu }{d m}(\cdot ) = F^{\prime }(\cdot )
(d)

λ(⋅)≡mF−1(⋅)\lambda (\cdot ) \equiv m F^{-1}(\cdot ) is a measure on B([c,d])\mathcal{B}([c, d]) and λ≪m\lambda \ll m with

dλdm(⋅)=(F′(F−1(⋅)))−1 \frac{d \lambda }{d m}(\cdot ) = \left(F^{\prime }\left(F^{-1}(\cdot )\right)\right)^{-1}
(e)

For any measure μ≪m\mu \ll m on B([a,b])\mathcal{B}([a, b]) the measure ψ(⋅)≡μF−1(⋅)\psi (\cdot ) \equiv \mu F^{-1}(\cdot ) is dominated by mm with

dψdm=dμdm(F−1(⋅))(F′(F−1(⋅)))−1 \frac{d \psi }{d m} = \frac{d \mu }{d m}\left(F^{-1}(\cdot )\right)\left(F^{\prime }\left(F^{-1}(\cdot )\right)\right)^{-1}
(f)

Establish (a) assuming that gg and F′F^{\prime } are both continuous noting that both integrals reduce to Riemann integrals.

Problem 4.21

Let F:R→RF: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be absolutely continuous on every finite interval.

?
(a)

Show that the ff in (4.1) can be chosen independently of the interval [a,b][a, b].

(b)

Further, if ff is integrable over R\mathbb {R}, then lim⁡x→−∞F(x)≡F(−∞)\lim_{x \rightarrow -\infty } F(x) \equiv F(-\infty ) and lim⁡x→∞F(x)≡F(∞)\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty } F(x) \equiv F(\infty ) exist and F(x)=F(−∞)+∫(−∞,x)fdμLF(x) = F(-\infty )+ \int_{(-\infty , x)} f d \mu_{L} for all xx in R\mathbb {R}.

(c)

Give an example where F:R→RF: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} is a.c., but ff is not integrable over R\mathbb {R}.

Problem 4.22

Let F:R→RF: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be absolutely continuous on bounded intervals. Let {Ij=1≤j≤k≤∞}\left\{ I_{j} = 1 \leq j \leq k \leq \infty \right\} be a collection of disjoint intervals such that ⋃j=1kIj≡R\bigcup_{j = 1}^{k} I_{j} \equiv \mathbb {R} and on each Ij,F′(⋅)>0I_{j}, F^{\prime }(\cdot ) > 0 a.e. or F′(⋅)<0F^{\prime }(\cdot ) < 0 a.e. w.r.t. mm.

?
(a)

Show that for any h∈L1(R,m)h \in L^{1}(\mathbb {R}, m),

∫Rhdm=∫Rh(F(⋅))∣F′(⋅)∣dm. \int _{\mathbb {R}} h d m = \int _{\mathbb {R}} h(F(\cdot ))\left|F^{\prime }(\cdot )\right| d m.
(b)

Show that if μ\mu is a measure on (R,B(R))(\mathbb {R}, \mathcal{B}(\mathbb {R})) dominated by mm then the measure μF−1(⋅)\mu F^{-1}(\cdot ) is also dominated by mm and

dμF−1dm(y)=∑xj∈D(y)f(xj)∣F′(xj)∣ \frac{d \mu F^{-1}}{d m}(y) = \sum _{x_{j} \in D(y)} \frac{f\left(x_{j}\right)}{\left|F^{\prime }\left(x_{j}\right)\right|}

where f(⋅)=dμdmf(\cdot ) = \frac{d \mu }{d m} and D(y)={xj:xj∈Ij,F(xj)=y}D(y) = \left\{ x_{j}: x_{j} \in I_{j}, F\left(x_{j}\right) = y\right\}.

(c)

Let μ\mu be the N(0,1)\mathscr {N}\left(0, 1\right) measure on (R,B(R))(\mathbb {R}, \mathcal{B}(\mathbb {R})), i.e.,

dμdm(x)=12ne−x22,−∞<x<∞ \frac{d \mu }{d m}(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 n}} e^{-\frac{x^{2}}{2}},-\infty < x < \infty

Let F(x)=x2F(x) = x^{2}. Find dμF−1dm\frac{d \mu F^{-1}}{d m}.

Problem 4.23

Let f:R→Rf: \mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be integrable w.r.t. mm on bounded intervals. Show that for almost all x0x_{0} in R\mathbb {R} (w.r.t. mm),

lim⁡a↑x0b↓x01(b−a)∫ab∣f(x)−f(x0)∣dx=0. \lim _{\substack {a \uparrow x_{0} \\ b \downarrow x_{0}}} \frac{1}{(b-a)} \int _{a}^{b}\left|f(x)-f\left(x_{0}\right)\right| d x = 0.
?
Problem 4.24

Use the hint to the above problem to establish Theorem 4.4.5.

?
Problem 4.25

Let (Ω,B)(\Omega , \mathcal{B}) be a measurable space. Let {μn}n≥1\left\{ \mu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} and μ\mu be σ\sigma-finite measures on (Ω,B)(\Omega , \mathcal{B}). Let for each n≥1,μn=μna+μnsn \geq 1, \mu_{n} = \mu_{n a}+\mu_{n s} be the Lebesgue decomposition of μn\mu_{n} w.r.t. μ\mu with μna≪μ\mu_{n a} \ll \mu and μns⊥μ\mu_{n s} \perp \mu. Let λ=∑n≥1μn,λa=∑n≥1μna,λs=∑n≥1μns\lambda = \sum_{n \geq 1} \mu_{n}, \lambda_{a} = \sum_{n \geq 1} \mu_{n a}, \lambda_{s} = \sum_{n \geq 1} \mu_{n s}. Show that λa≪μ\lambda_{a} \ll \mu and λs⊥μ\lambda_{s} \perp \mu and that λ=λa+λs\lambda = \lambda_{a}+\lambda_{s} is the Lebesgue decomposition of λ\lambda w.r.t. μ\mu.

?
Problem 4.26

Let {μn}n≥1\left\{ \mu_{n}\right\}_{n \geq 1} be Radon measures on (Rk,B(Rk))\left(\mathbb {R}^{k}, \mathcal{B}\left(\mathbb {R}^{k}\right)\right) and mm be the Lebesgue measure on Rk\mathbb {R}^{k}. Show that if λ=∑n=1∞μn\lambda = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty } \mu_{n} is also a Radon measure, then

Dλ=∑n=1∞Dμn a.e. (m) D \lambda = \sum _{n = 1}^{\infty } D \mu _{n} \quad \text{ a.e. } \quad (m)
?
Problem 4.27

Let Fn,n≥1F_{n}, n \geq 1 be a sequence of nondecreasing functions from R→R\mathbb {R} \rightarrow \mathbb {R}. Let F(x)=∑n≥1Fn(x)<∞F(x) = \sum_{n \geq 1} F_{n}(x) < \infty for all x∈Rx \in \mathbb {R}. Show that F(⋅)F(\cdot ) is nondecreasing and

F′(⋅)=∑n≥1Fn′(⋅) a.e. (m) F^{\prime }(\cdot ) = \sum _{n \geq 1} F_{n}^{\prime }(\cdot ) \quad \text{ a.e. } \quad (m)
?
Problem 4.28

Let EE be a Lebesgue measurable set in R\mathbb {R}. The metric density of EE at xx is defined as

DE(x)≡lim⁡δ↓0m(E∩(x−δ,x+δ))2δ D_{E}(x) \equiv \lim _{\delta \downarrow 0} \frac{m(E \cap (x-\delta , x+\delta ))}{2 \delta }

if it exists. Show that DE(⋅)=IE(⋅)D_{E}(\cdot ) = I_{E}(\cdot ) a.e. mm.

?
Problem 4.29

Let F,G:[a,b]→RF, G:[a, b] \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be both absolutely continuous. Show that H=FGH = F G is also absolutely continuous on [a,b][a, b] and that

∫[a,b]FdG+∫[a,b]GdF=F(b)G(b)−F(a)G(a). \int _{[a, b]} F d G+\int _{[a, b]} G d F = F(b) G(b)-F(a) G(a).
?
Problem 4.30

Let (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \mu ) be a finite measure space. Fix 1≤p<∞1 \leq p < \infty. Let TT : Lp(μ)→RL^{p}(\mu ) \rightarrow \mathbb {R} be a bounded linear functional as defined in (3.2.10) (cf. Section 3.2). Complete the following outline of a proof of Theorem 3.2.3 (Riesz representation theorem).

?
(a)

Let ν(A)≡T(IA),A∈F\nu (A) \equiv T\left(I_{A}\right), A \in \mathcal{F}. Verify that ν(⋅)\nu (\cdot ) is a signed measure on (Ω,F)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}).

(b)

Verify that ∣ν∣≪μ\left|\nu \right| \ll \mu.

(c)

Let g≡dνdμg \equiv \frac{d \nu }{d \mu }. Show that g∈Lq(μ)g \in L^{q}(\mu ) where q=pp−1,1<p<∞q = \frac{p}{p-1}, 1 < p < \infty and q=∞q = \infty if p=1p = 1.

(d)

Show that T=TgT = T_{g}.

Problem 4.31

Prove Theorem 4.5.2 and Corollary 4.5.3.

?
Problem 4.32

For 0<α<10 < \alpha < 1, construct a Cantor like set CαC_{\alpha } as described in Remark 4.5.1.

?
Problem 4.33

Show that the Cantor ternary function can be expressed as in (5.5).

?
Problem 4.34

Let (Ω,F,μ)(\Omega , \mathcal{F}, \mu ) be a σ\sigma-finite measure space.

?
(a)

Let G\mathcal{G} be a σ\sigma-algebra ⊂F\subset \mathcal{F}. Let f:Ω→R+f: \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{+}be ⟨F,B(R)⟩\langle \mathcal{F}, \mathcal{B}(\mathbb {R})\rangle measurable. Show that there exists a g:Ω→R+g: \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{+}that is ⟨G,B(R)⟩\langle \mathcal{G}, \mathcal{B}(\mathbb {R})\rangle-measurable and ν(A)≡∫Afdμ=∫Agdμ\nu (A) \equiv \int_{A} f d \mu = \int_{A} g d \mu for all AA in G\mathcal{G}. (Hint: Apply Theorem 4.1.1 (b) to the measures ν\nu and μ\mu restricted to G\mathcal{G}. When μ\mu is a probability measure, gg is called the conditional expectation of ff given G\mathcal{G} (cf. Chapter 12).)

(b)

Now suppose G=σ⟨{Ai}i≥1⟩\mathcal{G} = \sigma \left\langle \left\{ A_{i}\right\}_{i \geq 1}\right\rangle where {Ai}i≥1\left\{ A_{i}\right\}_{i \geq 1} is a partition of Ω⊂F\Omega \subset \mathcal{F}. Determine g(⋅)g(\cdot ) explicitly on each AiA_{i} such that 0<μ(Ai)<∞0 < \mu \left(A_{i}\right) < \infty.