Differentiation
[34/0%]Show that in the proof of Theorem 4.1.1, where and satisfies (1.9).
Verify that , defined in (1.14) and are singular.
Let be the counting measure on and for some nonnegative function . Show that is countable.
Prove Proposition 4.1.2.
Find the Lebesgue decomposition of w.r.t. and the RadonNikodym derivative in the following cases where is the absolutely continuous component of w.r.t. .
, where and .
, where and Pois1.
where , and .
Pois1.
The measures referred to above are defined in Tables 4.6.1 and 4.6.2, given at the end of this section.
Let be a measure space and . Let
Show that is a finite signed measure.
Show that and for , , and .
Let and be two finite measures such that both are dominated by a -finite measure . Show that the total variation measure of the signed measure is given by where for .
Conclude that if and are two measures on a countable set with , then .
Show that if is the Binomial measure and is the Poisson measure, , then as uniformly on iff . (Hint: Show that for each and use Scheffe's theorem.)
Let be a finite signed measure on a measurable space and let be the total variation measure corresponding to . Show that for any ,
where is as defined in (2.13).
Show that the Banach space of finite signed measures on is isomorphic to , the Banach space of absolutely convergent sequences in .
Let and be two probability measures on .
Show that
(Hint: For any is a partition of and so , since and are probability measures. For the opposite inequality, use the Hahn decomposition of w.r.t. and the fact .
Show that is also equal to
where is the collection of all -measurable functions from to such that .
Let be a measurable space.
Let be a sequence of finite measures on . Show that there exists a probability measure such that . (Hint: Consider )
Extend (a) to the case where are -finite.
Conclude that for any sequence of finite signed measures on , there exists a probability measure such that for all .
Let be a sequence of finite measures on a measurable space . Show that there exists a finite measure on such that iff there is a finite measure dominating and , such that the Radon-Nikodym derivatives in measure on and .
Let and be two finite measures on . Let be the Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym decomposition of w.r.t. as in Theorem 4.1.1. Show that if , then for all ,
is the Radon-Nikodym derivative of w.r.t. . Conclude that if , then and if , then .
Compute if for the following cases
-
-
-
.
Establish Proposition 4.2.7.
Give another proof of the completeness of by verifying the following steps.
For any sequence in , there is a finite measure and such that
Cauchy in is the same as Cauchy in and hence, the completeness of follows from the completeness of .
Let .
Show that and that the same is true for and .
Show that for any ,
and do the same for and .
For any .
Let and let for all in . Show that and do the same for and .
Let . Show that is continuous except on an at most countable set.
Let be a.c. Show that it is of bounded variation.
Let be an absolutely continuous nondecreasing function on . Let be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure corresponding to . Show that for any ,
where is a nonnegative measurable function such that for any .
Let be absolutely continuous with a.e. on , where . Let and . Let denote the Lebesgue measure on . Show the following:
(Change of variables formula). For any and Lebesgue measurable and integrable w.r.t.
For any Borel set is also a Borel set.
is a measure on and with
is a measure on and with
For any measure on the measure is dominated by with
Establish (a) assuming that and are both continuous noting that both integrals reduce to Riemann integrals.
Let be absolutely continuous on every finite interval.
Show that the in (4.1) can be chosen independently of the interval .
Further, if is integrable over , then and exist and for all in .
Give an example where is a.c., but is not integrable over .
Let be absolutely continuous on bounded intervals. Let be a collection of disjoint intervals such that and on each a.e. or a.e. w.r.t. .
Show that for any ,
Show that if is a measure on dominated by then the measure is also dominated by and
where and .
Let be the measure on , i.e.,
Let . Find .
Let be integrable w.r.t. on bounded intervals. Show that for almost all in (w.r.t. ),
Use the hint to the above problem to establish Theorem 4.4.5.
Let be a measurable space. Let and be -finite measures on . Let for each be the Lebesgue decomposition of w.r.t. with and . Let . Show that and and that is the Lebesgue decomposition of w.r.t. .
Let be Radon measures on and be the Lebesgue measure on . Show that if is also a Radon measure, then
Let be a sequence of nondecreasing functions from . Let for all . Show that is nondecreasing and
Let be a Lebesgue measurable set in . The metric density of at is defined as
if it exists. Show that a.e. .
Let be both absolutely continuous. Show that is also absolutely continuous on and that
Let be a finite measure space. Fix . Let : be a bounded linear functional as defined in (3.2.10) (cf. Section 3.2). Complete the following outline of a proof of Theorem 3.2.3 (Riesz representation theorem).
Let . Verify that is a signed measure on .
Verify that .
Let . Show that where and if .
Show that .
Prove Theorem 4.5.2 and Corollary 4.5.3.
For , construct a Cantor like set as described in Remark 4.5.1.
Show that the Cantor ternary function can be expressed as in (5.5).
Let be a -finite measure space.
Let be a -algebra . Let be measurable. Show that there exists a that is -measurable and for all in . (Hint: Apply Theorem 4.1.1 (b) to the measures and restricted to . When is a probability measure, is called the conditional expectation of given (cf. Chapter 12).)
Now suppose where is a partition of . Determine explicitly on each such that .