Fundamental class and top homology of manifolds

[14/100%]
Show
LaTeX

For a manifold MM with possibly empty boundary, there is a map SM:Hn(M,∂M)→Γint MS_M : H_n(M, \partial M) \to \Gamma_{\mathrm{int}\, M} so that SM(α)(x)=rx(α)S_M(\alpha )(x) = r_x(\alpha ).

?
(a)

Show that SM(α)S_M(\alpha ) satisfies the local consistency condition required for a section.

(b)

Show that SMS_M is a homomorphism.

Suppose that MM is connected and compact, ∂M=∅\partial M = \emptyset.

?
(a)

Hi(M)=0H_i(M) = 0, i>ni > n.

(b)

If MM is nonorientable, then Hn(M)=0H_n(M) = 0.

(c)

If MM is orientable via a section s(x)=μxs(x) = \mu_x, then there exists μ∈Hn(M)\mu \in H_n(M) with rx(μ)=μxr_x(\mu ) = \mu_x.

Remark.
?

For part (c), take A=MA = M in Theorem 6.15.3 (the main tool for this exercise and Exercises 6.15.24-6.15.35): let MM be a connected nn-manifold, with ∂M=∅\partial M = \emptyset, and let AA be a compact subset of MM. (1) HiM,A=0H_i^{M,A} = 0, i>ni > n. (2) If α∈HnM,A\alpha \in H_n^{M,A} and rA,x(α)=0r_{A,x}(\alpha ) = 0 for all x∈Ax \in A, then α=0\alpha = 0. (3) If MM is oriented via a section s(x)=μxs(x) = \mu_x, then there exists μA∈HnM,A\mu_A \in H_n^{M,A} with rA,x(μA)=μxr_{A,x}(\mu_A) = \mu_x. Proposition 6.15.1 (remark to Exercise 6.15.11) asserts that Theorem 6.15.3 is true for M=RnM = \mathbb {R}^{n} and AA a compact convex set.

Problem 6.15.24 from Lawson T. "Topology: A Geometric Approach" [Law06]More problems in Section 6.15 "Orientation and homology"

Suppose MM is connected and is not compact and ∂M=∅\partial M = \emptyset. Let i≥ni \geq n. Let α∈Hi(M)\alpha \in H_i(M) be represented by a chain cc and suppose SS is the support of cc.

?
(a)

Show that there is an open set UU with S⊂US \subset U and Uˉ\bar{U} compact.

(b)

Let V=M∖UˉV = M \setminus \bar{U}. Show that Hi(U)≃Hi(U∪V,V)H_i(U) \simeq H_i(U \cup V, V).

(c)

Use the long exact sequence of the triple (M,U∪V,U)(M, U \cup V, U) and Theorem 6.15.3(1) (Exercise 6.15.23) to show that Hi(U∪V,V)=0H_i(U \cup V, V) = 0 for i>ni > n.

(d)

Show that α=0\alpha = 0 when i>ni > n.

(e)

For the remaining parts, let i=ni = n. Show that rx(α)=0r_x(\alpha ) = 0 for all x∈Mx \in M by evaluating it at x∈Vx \in V.

(f)

By first regarding cc as a chain in (U∪V,V)(U \cup V, V) and using the long exact sequence of the triple, show that α=0\alpha = 0.

Exercises 6.15.23--6.15.24 have taken care of Theorem 6.15.2(1)--(3) (stated in the remark to Exercise 6.15.6) when ∂M=∅\partial M = \emptyset. The following exercises assume ∂M≠∅\partial M \neq \emptyset, using the fact that there is a collar neighborhood CC of ∂M\partial M homeomorphic to ∂M×[0,1]\partial M \times [0,1].

Let C≃h∂M×[0,1]C \simeq_h \partial M \times [0,1] be a collar. Let Ct=h[0,t)C_t = h[0,t) and At=M∖CtA_t = M \setminus C_t, t≤1t \leq 1.

?
(a)

Show that MM, int M\mathrm{int}\, M, and AtA_t deformation-retract to A1A_1.

(b)

Show that (M,Ct)(M, C_t) deformation-retracts to (M,∂M)(M, \partial M) for t<1t < 1.

(c)

Show that Hi(M)≃Hi(int M)H_i(M) \simeq H_i(\mathrm{int}\, M).

(d)

Show that the map induced by inclusion Hi(M,∂M)→HiM,AtH_i(M, \partial M) \to H_i^{M, A_t} is an isomorphism for all tt.

Using Exercise 6.15.25 (for MM with ∂M≠∅\partial M \neq \emptyset), show that Hi(M)=0H_i(M) = 0, i≥ni \geq n (taking care of the remaining cases of Theorem 6.15.2(1)--(4)).

?

Suppose MM is compact and orientable with ∂M≠∅\partial M \neq \emptyset. Let s(x)=μx∈Γint Ms(x) = \mu_x \in \Gamma_{\mathrm{int}\, M} be a section for x∈int Mx \in \mathrm{int}\, M. Show that there exists a class in Hn(M,∂M)H_n(M, \partial M) which maps to μx\mu_x under the map rx:Hn(M,∂M)→HnM,xr_x : H_n(M, \partial M) \to H_n^{M,x} for each x∈int Mx \in \mathrm{int}\, M (this takes care of Theorem 6.15.2(5)).

?

We now return to prove Theorem 6.15.3 (stated in the remark to Exercise 6.15.23). The key is to examine the relative Mayer--Vietoris sequence connecting the homology of (M,M∖C)(M, M \setminus C) when CC takes on the values C=A,B,A∩B,A∪BC = A, B, A \cap B, A \cup B, using (M∖A)∪(M∖B)=M∖(A∩B)(M \setminus A) \cup (M \setminus B) = M \setminus (A \cap B), (M∖A)∩(M∖B)=M∖(A∪B)(M \setminus A) \cap (M \setminus B) = M \setminus (A \cup B).

Show that if U,VU, V are open sets in MM, then there is a long exact sequence with segment

Hk+1(M,U∪V)→δHk(M,U∩V)→ikHk(M,U)⊕Hk+1(M,V)→jkHk(M,U∪V). H_{k+1}(M, U \cup V) \xrightarrow {\delta } H_k(M, U \cap V) \xrightarrow {i_k} H_k(M,U) \oplus H_{k+1}(M,V) \xrightarrow {j_k} H_k(M, U \cup V).
?
Remark.
?

Start with the diagram

000↓↓↓0→Sk(U∩V)→Sk(U)⊕Sk(V)→Sk(U)+Sk(V)→0↓↓↓0→Sk(M)→Sk(M)⊕Sk(M)→Sk(M)→0↓↓↓0→Sk(M,U∩V)→Sk(M,U)⊕Sk(M,V)→Sk(M)/(Sk(U)+Sk(V))→0↓↓↓000 \begin{array}{ccccccccc}& 0 & & 0 & & 0 & & & \\ & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & & \\ 0 \to & S_k(U \cap V) & \to & S_k(U) \oplus S_k(V) & \to & S_k(U) + S_k(V) & \to & 0 \\ & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & & \\ 0 \to & S_k(M) & \to & S_k(M) \oplus S_k(M) & \to & S_k(M) & \to & 0 \\ & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & & \\ 0 \to & S_k(M, U \cap V) & \to & S_k(M,U) \oplus S_k(M,V) & \to & S_k(M)/(S_k(U)+S_k(V)) & \to & 0 \\ & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & \downarrow & & & \\ & 0 & & 0 & & 0 & & & \end{array}

and consider the horizontal rows as chain complexes and the vertical columns as giving an exact sequence of chain complexes. Look at the long exact sequence in homology to see that it says that the bottom horizontal row is exact. Then take the long exact sequence arising from this exact row. Then show that the fact that there is an isomorphism induced by inclusion between Hk{U,V}(U∪V)H_k^{\left\{ U,V\right\} }(U \cup V) and Hk(U∪V)H_k(U \cup V) leads to an isomorphism between Hk(M,U∪V)H_k(M, U \cup V) and Hk(S(M)/(S(U)+S(V)))H_k(S(M)/(S(U) + S(V))).

Use Exercise 6.15.28 to show that if A,BA, B are closed subsets of MM, then there is a long exact sequence

⋯→Hk+1M,A∩B→HkM,A∪B→ikHkM,A⊕HkM,B→jkHkM,A∩B→δ⋯ . \cdots \to H_{k+1}^{M, A \cap B} \to H_k^{M, A \cup B} \xrightarrow {i_k} H_k^{M,A} \oplus H_k^{M,B} \xrightarrow {j_k} H_k^{M, A \cap B} \xrightarrow {\delta } \cdots .
?

The exact sequence of Exercise 6.15.29 is the basis for most of the remaining arguments proving Theorem 6.15.3 (Exercise 6.15.23): show that if A,B,A∩BA, B, A \cap B satisfy the conclusion of Theorem 6.15.3, then so does A∪BA \cup B.

?

The point of Exercise 6.15.30 is that we can inductively build up sets CC satisfying the conclusion of Theorem 6.15.3 (Exercise 6.15.23) by starting with pieces A,B,A∩BA, B, A \cap B having the property and using C=A∪BC = A \cup B. If CC is a compact subset of a coordinate neighborhood U⊂MU \subset M homeomorphic to Rn\mathbb {R}^{n}, then HkM,C≃HkRn,CH_k^{M,C} \simeq H_k^{\mathbb {R}^{n},C} by excision, so it suffices to prove these statements when M=RnM = \mathbb {R}^{n}. The starting point is when M=RnM = \mathbb {R}^{n} and CC is a cube of some dimension kk with 0≤k≤n0 \leq k \leq n (a product of intervals I1×⋯×InI_1 \times \cdots \times I_n, each interval of the form [ai,bi][a_i, b_i] with ai≤bia_i \leq b_i) -- this case is Proposition 6.15.1 (remark to Exercise 6.15.11).

Now consider the space CsC^s formed from an nn-cube by subdividing it using subdivisions of each subinterval. This is built up from subcubes by adding them one step at a time, where the intersections are finite unions of cubes of lower dimension; think of this as a CW complex whose cells are embedded cubes of various dimensions. Let KK be any subcomplex of CsC^s.

Show that if KK is a subcomplex of CsC^s, then the conclusion of Theorem 6.15.3 holds for KK.

?
Remark.
?

Use induction on the number of cells in KK and Exercise 6.15.30.

Suppose AA is a compact subset of Rn\mathbb {R}^{n}, contained in a large cube CC. By subdividing this cube into subcubes successively (say subdivide the edges in half, fourths, etc.), let KiK^i be the subcomplex of the iith subdivision consisting of all closed subcubes which intersect AA somewhere in their interior (notation as in Exercise 6.15.31). We have ⋯⊂K2⊂K1⊂K0=C\cdots \subset K^2 \subset K^1 \subset K^0 = C and A⊂KiA \subset K^i for all ii, with A=⋂iKiA = \bigcap_i K^i.

Suppose α∈HiRn,A\alpha \in H_i^{\mathbb {R}^{n}, A} is represented by a chain cc. Look at ∂c\partial c: it is a finite sum of singular simplices, each with image in Rn∖A\mathbb {R}^{n} \setminus A. Let B⊂Rn∖AB \subset \mathbb {R}^{n} \setminus A be the compact set consisting of the images of these simplices.

?
(a)

Show that there is a minimal distance between points of AA and points of BB. Use this to show that there is an integer pp so that cc also represents a cycle of Si(Rn,Rn∖Kp)S_i(\mathbb {R}^{n}, \mathbb {R}^{n} \setminus K^p).

(b)

Show that (a) implies that α=0\alpha = 0 when i>ni > n, since it is in the image of Hi(Rn,Rn∖Kp)H_i(\mathbb {R}^{n}, \mathbb {R}^{n} \setminus K^p).

(c)

Suppose i=ni = n and rA,x(α)=0r_{A,x}(\alpha ) = 0 for x∈Ax \in A. Show that this means that if αK\alpha_K is the class represented by cc, then rKp,x(αK)=0r_{K^p, x}(\alpha_K) = 0 for x∈Kpx \in K^p. Then show that this implies that αK=0\alpha_K = 0 and hence α=0\alpha = 0.

(d)

Show that the usual orientation of Rn\mathbb {R}^{n} (Proposition 6.15.1) provides the class μA\mu_A that restricts to the orientation class μx\mu_x for x∈Ax \in A in the statement of Theorem 6.15.3.

We have now proved Theorem 6.15.3 (Exercise 6.15.23) when M=RnM = \mathbb {R}^{n} and AA is any compact subset (Exercise 6.15.32). Show that Theorem 6.15.3 holds for a general connected nn-manifold MM when AA is a compact subset of a coordinate neighborhood UU.

?

Show that any compact set A⊂MA \subset M can be written as the union A=A1∪⋯∪AmA = A_1 \cup \cdots \cup A_m of a finite number of sets AiA_i which are compact sets in a Euclidean neighborhood Ui⊂MU_i \subset M.

?

By using induction on the number of sets mm in the description of Exercise 6.15.34, and Exercise 6.15.33, complete the proof of Theorem 6.15.3 (Exercise 6.15.23).

?

References

[Law06] Lawson T. Topology: A Geometric Approach. Oxford University Press, 2006.