Young's inequality for convolutions
[9/11%]Prove that if , then their convolution has the following properties:
and ;
.
If , , and , show that and .
Prove Theorem 13.8 for the cases and .
Theorem 13.8 (Young's Inequality): Fix . If and then , and we have .
Definition 13.6: The convolution of measurable 1-periodic functions and is the function given by , whenever this integral is well defined.
Prove Theorem 13.9.
Theorem 13.9 (Young's Inequality): Fix . If and then , and we have .
The convolution of functions and on the line is defined to be the function given by the formula
Prove that if and belong to , then the integrand is integrable for almost all , and that the convolution also belongs to .
Suppose that the numbers , , are related by the equation . Prove that
Suppose , and .
Imitate the proof of Theorem 8.14 to show that the integral defining exists for almost all , that , and that
Show that equality can hold in (a) if and if , and find the conditions under which this happens.
Assume , and equality holds in (a). Show that then either a.e. or a.e.
Assume , and show that there exist and such that
Claim 6 (Young's Theorem): Let , let with . Then , -a.e. on , and .
This exercise generalizes Young's Theorem and requires the result of Exercise 3 in Section 8.1. Show the following: Let be such that . Let and . Then exists -a.e. on and is in . Also, .
If , then and , and the claim follows easily in this case. The same comment applies to the case where [and hence and ].
If , then and are conjugate exponents, and the claim follows by Hölder's Inequality.
Assume that now. This forces . Show that it is sufficient to prove the claim when both and .
Prove the claim in (c).
Claim 3: Let . Then and .
Since are nonnegative and -measurable, we may meaningfully discuss for each . Show that , and use Exercise 3 in Section 8.1 to obtain
for each . This shows that by Claim 3. It follows that , and Claim 3 applied to and gives
Let .
Show that if , then for all in
and hence that
is well defined a.e. and
with " = " holding iff either a.e. or a.e.
Show that if then
and " " can hold for some nonzero and . (Hint for (a): Use Jensen's inequality with probability measure if .)