Power-series coefficients controlled by the real part

[5/100%]
Show
LaTeX

We assume that the function

f(z)=a0+a1z+a2z2+⋯+anzn+⋯is regular in the disk∣z∣<R. f(z) = a_{0}+a_{1}z+a_{2}z^{2}+\cdots +a_{n}z^{n}+\cdots \quad \text{is regular in the disk} \quad \left|z\right|<R.

Express the coefficients a1,a2,…,an,…a_{1},a_{2},\ldots ,a_{n},\ldots in terms of the real and the imaginary part resp.of f(z)f(z) on the circle ∣z∣=r\left|z\right|=r, 0<r<R0<r<R.

?

The function

f(z)=12+a1z+⋯+anzn+⋯ f(z) = \frac{1}{2} + a_{1}z + \cdots + a_{n}z^{n} + \cdots

is assumed to be regular and to have positive real part in the open disk ∣z∣<1\left|z\right|<1. Then ∣an∣≤1\left|a_{n}\right|\leq 1, n=1,2,…n=1,2,\ldots In none of these inequalities can we replace 11 by a smaller number.

?

Suppose that the function

f(z)=a0+a1z+a2z2+⋯+anzn+⋯is regular and that\ref(z)<A f(z) = a_{0}+a_{1}z+a_{2}z^{2}+\cdots +a_{n}z^{n}+\cdots \quad \text{is regular and that} \quad \re f(z)<A

on the disk ∣z∣<R\left|z\right|<R. Then the inequality

∣a0∣+∣a1∣r+∣a2∣r2+⋯+∣an∣rn+⋯≤∣a0∣+2rR−r(A−\rea0) \left|a_{0}\right|+\left|a_{1}\right|r+\left|a_{2}\right|r^{2}+\cdots +\left|a_{n}\right|r^{n}+\cdots \leq \left|a_{0}\right| + \frac{2r}{R-r}(A-\re a_{0})

holds for 0<r<R0<r<R. Example: f(z)=z+1z−1f(z)=\dfrac {z+1}{z-1}, R=1R=1, A=0A=0.

?

We assume that the function f(z)=a0+a1z+⋯+anzn+⋯f(z) = a_{0}+a_{1}z+\cdots +a_{n}z^{n}+\cdots is regular in the disk ∣z∣<R\left|z\right|<R and we denote by Δ(f)\Delta (f) the largest oscillation of the real part of f(z)f(z) in ∣z∣<R\left|z\right|<R, i.e.Δ(f)\Delta (f) is the least upper bound of ∣\ref(z1)−\ref(z2)∣\left|\re f(z_{1})-\re f(z_{2})\right| for ∣z1∣<R\left|z_{1}\right|<R, ∣z2∣<R\left|z_{2}\right|<R. Then we have

∣a1∣R≤2πΔ(f). \left|a_{1}\right|R \leq \frac{2}{\pi }\Delta (f).

The factor 2π\dfrac {2}{\pi } cannot be replaced by a smaller one.

Interpret this proposition geometrically.

?

Let the function f(z)=a0+a1z+⋯+anzn+⋯f(z) = a_{0}+a_{1}z+\cdots +a_{n}z^{n}+\cdots be regular in the disk ∣z∣<R\left|z\right|<R and denote by D(f)D(f) the largest oscillation of f(z)f(z) for ∣z∣<R\left|z\right|<R, i.e.D(f)D(f) is the least upper bound of ∣f(z1)−f(z2)∣\left|f(z_{1})-f(z_{2})\right| for ∣z1∣<R\left|z_{1}\right|<R, ∣z2∣<R\left|z_{2}\right|<R. Then we have

∣a1∣R≤12D(f). \left|a_{1}\right|R \leq \frac{1}{2}D(f).

The factor 12\frac{1}{2} can not be replaced by a smaller one. Interpret this proposition geometrically.

?

References

[PóSz98] Pólya G., Szegő G. Problems and Theorems in Analysis. Springer, 1998.